Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 1;2018(9):CD012841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012841.pub2

Serra 2013.

Methods Prospective cohort
Setting: single centre
Country: Italy
Duration of follow‐up: 8 weeks
Treatments: all participants treated with appropriate surgery and compression (30‐40 mmHg)
Participants 31 participants with VLUs (study additionally reported on a group without ulcers)
Mean age: 51.5 (SD 9) years, range 42‐61 years
Sex (M:F): 9:22
Stage of ulcer: class 6 of CEAP (inclusion criterion)
Ulcer duration: > 6 weeks (inclusion criterion)
Ulcer size at baseline: median (range) 10.7 (2.1‐17.5) cm²
Wound infection: no infection within 6 weeks (exclusion criterion)
Number of wounds: 31
Inclusion criteria: aged 20‐70 years, VLU (class 6 CEAP), duration > 6 weeks, ABPI > 0.9
Exclusion criteria: arterial disease, infection within 6 weeks, connective tissue disorder, blood disorder, cancer
Prognostic factors MMP‐9 (continuous data); ng/total sample protein (μg). Measurement method ELISA: substrate and optical density measurements. Reported as ng per total sample protein (μg)
Time of measurement: baseline, within 24 hours of surgery at 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Wound fluid sampling method: occlusive dressings (fluid collected after 4 hours)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Selection bias Unclear risk Moderate: sample selection not stated
Attrition bias Low risk No missing data
Prognostic factor measurement Unclear risk Moderate: unclear if ELISA is adequate method and unclear if active or latent protease
Outcome measurement High risk Not adjusted for baseline; unclear if blinded
Adjustment factors High risk None of the key adjustment factors taken into account in the design or analysis
Analysis and reporting Unclear risk Moderate: data extracted from graph
Overall risk of bias High risk