Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 20;2018(7):CD008905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008905.pub3

Lopez‐Cano 2012.

Methods Randomised trial. Computerised randomisation
Participants 36 (mean age control group = 66 +/‐ 13.9 years, intervention group = 72 +/‐ 7.6 years), Male 18:18 Female
Interventions Participants were randomised into a group undergoing placement of a large‐pore lightweight mesh in the intraperitoneal/onlay position at the time of surgery (n = 19) or to a control group (no mesh) (n = 17).
Outcomes Incidence of parastomal hernia at 12 months (CT detected) and subcutaneous fat thickness at 12 months (CT measured)
Length of Follow Up 12 months
Notes 1 participant from the control group and 1 participant from the intervention group were lost to follow‐up.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated randomisation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Allocation was concealed prior to surgery.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: Not possible to blind the surgeon as to which procedure was being performed
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The reporting radiologist assessing participant CT scans was blinded to the allocation.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 8 of the 44 randomised participants were not included in the final analysis.
Comment: Clear explanation of incomplete follow‐up data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk We identified no selective reporting.
Early Stopping Low risk Comment: Sample size calculation included. No evidence of early stopping