Chugh 2012.
Methods | RCT with parallel groups Approved by the institutional ethical committee and written informed consents obtained from all participants Site: University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India Setting: university hospital Dates of data collection: unspecified |
|
Participants | 60 adults with intestinal perforation peritonitis‐induced sepsis scheduled for emergency laparotomy | |
Interventions |
Treatment group: tidal volume 6 mL/kg (IBW) and PEEP 10 cmH2O (n = 30) Control group: tidal volume 10 mL/kg (IBW) and no PEEP (n = 30) In both groups, respiratory rate was varied to maintain eucapnia |
|
Outcomes |
Relevant to this review
Others
|
|
Notes | Funding: unspecified Declaration of interest: none mentioned Conference abstract Volume per body weight: IBW, no further details |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "computer generated random number table" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "double‐blind." Details of blinding not provided |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "double‐blind." Details of blinding not provided |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No loss to follow‐up |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All results reported |
Other bias | Low risk | Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. |