Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 9;2018(7):CD011151. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011151.pub3

Chugh 2012.

Methods RCT with parallel groups
Approved by the institutional ethical committee and written informed consents obtained from all participants
Site: University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India
Setting: university hospital
Dates of data collection: unspecified
Participants 60 adults with intestinal perforation peritonitis‐induced sepsis scheduled for emergency laparotomy
Interventions Treatment group: tidal volume 6 mL/kg (IBW) and PEEP 10 cmH2O (n = 30)
Control group: tidal volume 10 mL/kg (IBW) and no PEEP (n = 30)
In both groups, respiratory rate was varied to maintain eucapnia
Outcomes Relevant to this review
  1. Hospital length of stay

  2. Mortality at 30 days (in hospital for a mean hospital length of stay of 9 days)


Others
  1. Multiple organ dysfunction/failure (maximum sepsis‐related organ failure assessment score)

  2. Plasma levels of interleukin‐6 and tumour necrosis factor α

  3. Minute ventilation

  4. End‐tidal carbon dioxide

  5. Intraoperative haemodynamic parameters

  6. Duration of mechanical ventilation

Notes Funding: unspecified
Declaration of interest: none mentioned
Conference abstract
Volume per body weight: IBW, no further details
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "computer generated random number table"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "double‐blind." Details of blinding not provided
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "double‐blind." Details of blinding not provided
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results reported
Other bias Low risk Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups.