Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 9;2018(7):CD011151. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011151.pub3

Ge 2013.

Methods RCT with parallel groups
Approved by the ethics committee and informed consent obtained
Site: Ningbo 6th Hospital, Ningbo Zhjiang, China
Setting: hospital
Dates of data collection: July 2011 to February 2012
Participants 60 participants aged 70–85 years, ASA class II or III, undergoing spinal fusion
Interventions Treatment group: tidal volume 6 mL/kg, rate 12˜18/min, inspiratory/expiratory ratio 1:2, PEEP 10 cmH2O mechanical ventilation and alveolar recruitment performed once every 15 min (n = 30)
Control group: tidal volume 12 mL/kg, rate 12/min and inspiratory/expiratory ratio 1:2 (n = 30)
Outcomes Relevant to this review
  1. Pneumonia at day 1 after surgery


Others
  1. pH, PaO2, PaCO2, PaO2/FiO2, alveolo‐arterial oxygen diffusion coefficient, heart rate, systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressure and central venous pressure

  2. Atelectasia

Notes Funding: unspecified
Declaration of interest: not mentioned
Volume per body weight: predicted body weight: men: 50 + 0.91 × height – 152.4; women: 45.5 + 0.91 × height – 152.4
Information for this trial was extracted by Shumming Pan and Yuhua‐Gao
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomly assigned, from Shumming Pan and judged as "randomized controlled trial:" by Yuhua‐Gao from page 82.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear
The allocation method allowed the record staff to know the treatment allocation of the next participant to be enrolled in the study.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk The allocation method allowed the record staff to know the treatment allocation of the next participant to be enrolled in the study.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk This study did not describe whether the outcome assessor was blinded to the intervention.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No participant selected for this study dropped out
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All the measurements stated in the methods section were included in the results.
Other bias Unclear risk No clear definition for pneumonia (possible inclusion of bronchitis or other pulmonary complications)