Xiong 2016.
Methods | RCT with parallel groups Approved by the ethics committee Informed consents obtained Site: First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China Setting: university hospital Dates of data collection: unspecified |
|
Participants | 60 ASA I or II participants aged ≥ 40 years undergoing elective spine surgery in the prone position for ≥ 3 hours and with a risk of complications score ≥ 26 Exclusion criteria: receiving mechanical ventilation 2 weeks before surgery; BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2; acute infection or sepsis 2 weeks before surgery; history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, thoracic or emergency surgery, progressive neuromuscular disease, acute lung injury or ARDS; need prolonged mechanical ventilation after surgery; poorly controlled hypertension; drug allergy; nausea and vomiting; history of psychological or neurological disease; or receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy |
|
Interventions |
Treatment group: tidal volume 6 mL/kg, PEEP 5 cmH2O and recruitment manoeuvres every 30 min (n = 30) Control group: tidal volume 10 mL/kg (n = 30) |
|
Outcomes |
Relevant to this review
Others
|
|
Notes | Funding: Ministry of Health, the National Key Laboratory of Clinical Specialties (Finance and Social Sciences (2011) No. 170); Chongqing Municipal Medical Key Discipline Project (Chongqing Wei Science and Education (2007) 2); Chongqing Municipal Health Bureau of Medical Science Key Project (2012‐018) Health Bureau Medical Research Project (2012‐1‐018) Declaration of interest: none mentioned Email sent to authors to request the number of participants who were diagnosed as having a pneumonia after surgery 17 June 2017. No reply received Volume per body weight: predicted body weight; men: 50 + 0.91 × (height in cm – 152.4); women: 45.5 + 0.91 × (height in cm – 152.4) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "randomized" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No loss to follow‐up |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All results reported |
Other bias | Low risk | Groups well balanced |