Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 11;2018(7):CD008449. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008449.pub3

Yoon 2014.

Methods RCT
Participants Country: Republic of Korea
Setting: inpatient rehabilitation centre
Age: adults (mean age: 57.8 years)
Sample size: 26 participants (8 in experimental group, 9 each in 2 control groups, no dropouts published)
Sex: 10 women, 16 men
Inclusion criteria: hemiplegia due to stroke < 6 weeks after onset, no past history of stroke, able to perform an active extension of the affected wrist and more than 2 fingers at an angle of > 10 ° and an active abduction of the affected thumb at an angle of > 10 °, capable of simple communication, can receive care by guardians or caregivers, able to maintain a sitting position for > 30 minutes
Exclusion criteria: people with depression who were unable to co‐operate in the treatment, not able to perform active task training due to musculoskeletal problems, spasticity of mAS II or higher, complex regional pain syndrome or secondary adhesive capsulitis
Interventions 3 arms
1, 2 and 3: conventional therapy
  1. Additional CIMT + MT

  2. Additional CIMT + self‐exercise

  3. Additional self‐exercise


1, 2 and 3: 2 weeks, 5 days a weeks, 40 minutes a day of conventional therapy
  1. Additional 2 hours, 3 times a day CIMT and 30 minutes MT a day

  2. Additional 2 hours, 3 times a day CIMT and 30 minutes self‐exercise a day

  3. Additional 30 minutes, 2 times a day, self‐exercise


Date of intervention: October 2012 to May 2013
Outcomes Outcomes were recorded at baseline and after 2 weeks of therapy
  1. FMA‐UE

  2. BBT

  3. 9‐hole Pegboard test,

  4. Grip strength

  5. BRS

  6. WMFT

  7. Korean version of modified Barthel Index (K‐MBI)

Notes Funding source: 2‐year research grant of Pusan National University, Republik of Korea
Declarations of trialists’ interests: there are no conflicts of interest
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Participants were randomly assigned by random cards with numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 primary outcome Unclear risk Not stated