Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;2012(12):CD002308. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002308.pub2

Summary of findings for the main comparison. ICS versus placebo.

ICS versus placebo
Patient or population: people with acute asthma
 Settings: emergency department
 Intervention: ICS therapy
Control: placebo
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control ICS therapy
Hospital admission 316 per 1000 169 per 1000
 (125 to 220) OR 0.44 
 (0.31 to 0.61) 959
 (12 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1 There was conflicting evidence from the studies of ICS in addition to systemic corticosteroids (I2 = 52%)
FEV1 at 1 hour The mean FEV1 ranged from 1.41 to 2.17 L The mean FEV1 at 1 hour in the intervention groups was
 0.28 L higher
 (0.22 lower to 0.77 higher) MD 0.28
(95% CI ‐0.22 to 0.77)
248
 (4 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low2  
FEV1 at 3 to 4 hours The mean FEV1 ranged from 1.7 to 2.1 L The mean FEV1 at 3 to 4 hours in the intervention groups was
 0.15 L higher
 (0.09 lower to 0.39 higher) MD 0.15
(95% CI ‐0.09 to 0.39)
319
 (4 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate3  
Adverse effects ‐ nausea/vomiting 64 per 1000 21 per 1000
 (2 to 178) OR 0.32 
 (0.03 to 3.18) 94
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low4  
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: confidence interval; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; OR: odds ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Point deducted in hospital admissions due to variability in risk of bias among contributing trials and a point deducted due to heterogeneity.

2 Point deducted in FEV1 at 1 hour due to variability in risk of bias among contributing trials, and an additional point deducted for the very high level of heterogeneity (I2 = 90%).

3 Point deducted in FEV1 at 3 to 4 hours due to heterogeneity (I2 = 55%).

4 2 points deducted due to wide CI and only one study contributing to outcome.