Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;2012(12):CD002308. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002308.pub2

Go 2010.

Methods Design: randomised controlled trial
Participants Age: 18 to 60 years
Randomised: ICS 16, systemic corticosteroid 17
Groups were reported to be comparable in terms of demographic variables except for oxygen saturation and corticosteroid use at baseline
Inclusion criteria: adults with known bronchial asthma
Exclusion criteria: status asthmaticus, COPD or corticosteroid intake in past 2 weeks
Interventions Intervention: inhaled fluticasone (dose not stated) via ultrasonic nebuliser every 15 min with inhaled short‐acting beta2‐agonists
Control: hydrocortisone 250 mg/mL IV single dose with inhaled short‐acting beta2‐agonists
Outcomes Baseline demographic and clinical factors including vital signs, wheeze, RR, oxygen saturation, baseline PEF and mean rate of change in PEF post intervention
Notes ICS versus systemic corticosteroid comparison
Trial added in 2012 update
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Conference abstract – very limited information. It is stated that the patients were randomised to treatment
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Conference abstract – very limited information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Conference abstract – very limited information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Conference abstract – very limited information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Conference abstract – very limited information
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Conference abstract – very limited information