Go 2010.
Methods | Design: randomised controlled trial | |
Participants | Age: 18 to 60 years Randomised: ICS 16, systemic corticosteroid 17 Groups were reported to be comparable in terms of demographic variables except for oxygen saturation and corticosteroid use at baseline Inclusion criteria: adults with known bronchial asthma Exclusion criteria: status asthmaticus, COPD or corticosteroid intake in past 2 weeks |
|
Interventions | Intervention: inhaled fluticasone (dose not stated) via ultrasonic nebuliser every 15 min with inhaled short‐acting beta2‐agonists Control: hydrocortisone 250 mg/mL IV single dose with inhaled short‐acting beta2‐agonists |
|
Outcomes | Baseline demographic and clinical factors including vital signs, wheeze, RR, oxygen saturation, baseline PEF and mean rate of change in PEF post intervention | |
Notes | ICS versus systemic corticosteroid comparison Trial added in 2012 update |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Conference abstract – very limited information. It is stated that the patients were randomised to treatment |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Conference abstract – very limited information |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Conference abstract – very limited information |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Conference abstract – very limited information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Conference abstract – very limited information |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Conference abstract – very limited information |