Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;2012(12):CD002308. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002308.pub2

Milani 2004.

Methods Design: randomised controlled trial
 Method of randomisation: not stated
 Means of allocation concealment: not stated
 Withdrawals/drop‐outs: 1 patient in the placebo/placebo group was excluded from the study at 60 min because of worsening clinical status and was admitted
 Blinding: double‐blind, placebo controlled
Participants Eligible: unclear
 Randomised: (placebo/inhaled/oral corticosteroids): 15/17/17
 Completed: placebo 14, inhaled 17, oral 17
 Sex (M/F): placebo 9/6, inhaled 8/9, oral 8/9
 Age (mean (SD)) (months): placebo 49.6 (15.6), inhaled 51.1 (18.7), oral 47.3 (16.3)
 Asthma diagnosis: ≥ 3 previous episodes, current episode lasting ≥ 6 h
 Inclusion criteria: moderate acute asthma defined as audible wheeze, use of accessory muscles, increased RR and an inability either to walk or to speak more than 3 to 5 words per breath
 Exclusion criteria: chronic or acute cardiopulmonary disease, use of systemic corticosteroids within the past 14 days, use of ICS within the past 72 h, severe exacerbations, other previous medical conditions
Interventions Setting: patients with acute asthma who sought treatment at the paediatric walk‐in clinic at 1 hospital in Brazil
 Intervention: this trial had 3 treatment groups. Group 1 received inhaled placebo and oral placebo. Group 2 received inhaled placebo and oral prednisone 1 mg/kg. Group 3 received nebulised budesonide 2 mg and oral placebo
 All patients received nebulised salbutamol 0.15 mg/kg. This was repeated if the patients' severity scores or oxygen saturations worsened. After 4 h' observation, patients were discharged with a prescription for inhaled bronchodilators
Outcomes Primary outcome were clinical severity scores and oxygen saturations. The clinical severity score was calculated based on: RR, wheezing, retraction, dyspnoea and oxygen saturation
Notes This trial was included in July 2005 in both the primary and secondary analyses. The author was not contacted
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of random sequence generation not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of allocation concealment not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Trial reported as double‐blind
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding of study personnel responsible for outcome assessment indicates the risk of detection bias would be low
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 1 patient in the placebo/placebo group was excluded from the study at 60 min because of worsening clinical status and was admitted
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No apparent indication of reporting bias