Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;2012(12):CD002308. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002308.pub2

Scarfone 1995.

Methods Design: randomised controlled trial
 Method of randomisation: computer generated, blocks of 10
 Means of allocation concealment: allocation list kept by pharmacy, who provided study drugs according to the list
 Blinding: double‐blind, double‐dummy
 Withdrawal/drop‐outs: 17 patients were excluded after randomisation: pneumonia (7), missing scheduled albuterol treatment (3), vomiting study medication (5), parental withdrawal (1) or equipment failure (1)
Participants Eligible: unclear; convenience sample
 Randomised: 62/66
 Completed: 56/55
 Age (mean (SD)) (months): dexamethasone 64 (39), prednisone 55 (36). Range: 1 to 17
 Sex (M/F): dexamethasone 57%/43%, prednisone 62%/38%
 Asthma diagnosis: 1 prior episode wheezing, doctor's diagnosis
 Inclusion criteria: moderate exacerbation, defined by PIS > 8
 Major exclusions: severe exacerbation, defined by PIS > 13 or oxygen saturation < 88%, inhaled or systemic corticosteroids use in the preceding 72 h, vomiting oral study drug x 2, requiring more frequent albuterol than every 30 min or deteriorating status or missing a scheduled albuterol dose by > 10 min, previous enrolment, pneumonia, bronchiolitis or croup
 Baseline PIS (median): dexamethasone 10, prednisone 11
Interventions Setting: ED at a Children's Hospital in US
 Intervention 1: nebulised dexamethasone 1.5 mg/kg x 1
 Intervention 2: oral prednisone 2 mg/kg x 1
 Both groups received nebulised albuterol 15 mg/kg every 30 min x 3 doses then every 40 min as needed to a maximum of 6 doses, and supplemental oxygen to keep O2 saturation > 92%. On discharge all patients were given a prescription for prednisone 2 mg/kg in 2 divided doses for 5 days, and oral or inhaled albuterol 3 times per day for 7 days. Co‐interventions such as extra doses of beta2‐agonists, theophylline or ipratropium bromide were not permitted
Outcomes Hospital admissions, change in PIS, time to discharge, vomiting and relapse to additional care after discharge
 PIS calculated from scoring RR, wheezing, inspiratory/expiratory ratio, accessory muscle use and oxygen saturation
Notes This trial was only included in the secondary analysis comparing ICS versus systemic corticosteroids. The author was contacted and provided additional information about the study design; however, the data were not available for further analysis
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated random sequence
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Allocation list kept by pharmacy, who provided study drugs according to the list
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Trial reported as double‐blind, double‐dummy
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding of study personnel responsible for outcome assessment indicates the risk of detection bias would be low
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 17 patients were excluded after randomisation: pneumonia (7), missing scheduled albuterol treatment (3), vomiting study medication (5), parental withdrawal (1) or equipment failure (1)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No apparent indication of reporting bias