| A. DETAILS | |
| Describe the reference standard and how it was conducted and interpreted (cut and paste from paper if possible) |
|
| Operator characteristics (e.g. training) | |
| Thresholds/Criteria used to define positive and negative tests for target condition, if provided |
|
| B. ASSESSMENT RISK OF BIAS | |
| Is the reference standard likely to correctly classify the target condition? | o “Yes” if the reference standard used in the paper matches those chosen in this protocol (DSM criteria applied by a expert) o “No” if the above criteria is not met. o “Unclear” if insufficient information is presented. |
| Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test? | o “Yes” if the paper states that the reference test is interpreted by clinicians/researchers who had not seen the reference standard results. o “No” if the result(s) of the CAM‐ICU were known to the individual performing the DSM criteria. o “Unclear” if there is insufficient information to make a judgment about this issue. |
| Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias? | o “High” if a subset of reference standard tests were conducted or interpreted in a different manner, or under different conditions. o “Low” if it is clear that the conduct and interpretation of all reference standard tests were appropriate and could not have introduced bias. o “Unclear” if there is insufficient information presented to assess the potential of conduct and interpretation of the reference standard test to introduce bias. |
| C. CONCERNS ABOUT APLICABILITY | |
| Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard does not match the review question? | o “High” if the target condition is not delirium or it is not clearly stated. o “Low” if it is clearly stated that the target condition is delirium. o “Unclear” if there is insufficient information presented to assess potential concerns about the target condition. |