Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2019 Apr 10;127:495–502. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.074

Table 1:

Characteristics of employees of waterpipe tobacco venues in Istanbul and Moscow in 2013-2014

Characteristics Overall (N=110) Istanbul (N=61) Moscow (N=49) p-value (a)
Number of employees per venue 6 (5, 9) 11(5, 17) 6 (5, 9) <0.001
Age, years 30 (24, 42) 30 (24, 40) 29 (23, 48) 0.97
Male, % 76% 93% 55% <0.001
Education, % <0.001
  Less than high school 68% 88% 43%
  High school 22% 12% 35%
  College/university 10% 0% 22% 0.15
Primary job, %
  Owner/Manager 14% 17% 10%
  Bartender/Waiter 58% 62% 55%
  Cook/kitchen staff 11% 5% 18%
  Other(b) 17% 16% 17% <0.001
Smoking status, %
  Never smoker 18% 1% 39%
  Former smoker 7% 7% 8%
  Current cigarette only smoker 26% 18% 35%
  Current waterpipe only smoker 16% 26% 4%
  Current cigarette and waterpipe smoker 33% 48% 14%
Average time at work, hours/week 54(48, 66) 60 (54, 72) 48 (36, 48) 0.001
Lives with a smoker 0.017
  No 48% 36% 63%
  Yes, Cigarette Smoker Only 45% 56% 31%
  Yes, Cigarette and Waterpipe Smoker 7% 8% 6%
Secondhand smoke from cigarettes, hours/week 48 (32, 70) 60 (42, 84) 36 (25, 55) 0.001
Secondhand smoke from waterpipe, hours/week 21 (8, 42) 42 (13, 60) 10 (4, 24) 0.001
Involved with lighting waterpipes for customers,% yes 44% 57% 26% 0.001

Notes: Categorical variables are percentages of total sample (N). Continuous variables are median (25th percentile, 75th percentile).

(a)

P-values are Pearson’s chi-square test of independence for categorical variables and Ranksum for continuous variables.

(b)

“Other” includes watchman (N=6) and other miscellaneous primary positions.

The time of data collection were between January and May 2013 in Istanbul and December 2013 to May 2014 in Moscow