Skip to main content
. 2019 May 10;5(5):e01600. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01600

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

(4A) Escape latency in Morris water maze (MWM), results are expressed as Mean ± SE (n = 6). Significant difference between CON vs CUMS is marked as *p < 0.05 and CUMS vs CUMS + NIC group is indicated by ##p < 0.01, (4B) Time spent in the target quadrant, results are expressed as Mean ± SE (n = 6), Significant difference was not observed. (4C) ANY-maze images of open field test.