Development of Highly Selective 1,2,3-Triazole-containing Peptidic Polo-like Kinase 1 Polo-box Domain-binding Inhibitors

Abstract

Members of the polo-like kinase (Plk) family of serine/threonine protein kinases play crucial roles in cell cycle regulation and proliferation. Of the five Plks (Plk1–5), Plk1 is recognized as an anticancer drug target. Plk1 contains multiple structural components that are important for its proper biological function. These include an N-terminal catalytic domain and a C-terminal non-catalytic polo-box domain (PBD). The PBD binds to phosphothreonine (pT) and phosphoserine-containing sequences. Blocking PBD-dependent interactions offers a potential means of down-regulating Plk1 function that is distinct from targeting its ATP-binding site. Previously, we demonstrated by tethering alkylphenyl chains from the N(π)-position of the His residue in the 5-mer PLHSpT, that we were able to access a hydrophobic “cryptic” binding pocket on the surface of the PBD, and in so doing enhance binding affinities by approximately 1000-fold. More recently, we optimized these PBD-ligand interactions using an oxime ligation-based strategy. Herein, using azide-alkyne cycloaddition reactions, we explore new triazole-containing PBD-binding antagonists. Some of these ligands retain the high PBD-binding affinity of the parent peptide, while showing desirable enhanced selectivity for the PBD of Plk1 relative to the PBDs of Plk2 and Plk3.

1. Introduction

Members of the polo-like kinase (Plk) family play crucial roles in mammalian cell cycle regulation and proliferation [1]. Proper function of Plks 1–4 requires the coordinated phosphorylation of serine and threonine residues by N-terminal kinase domains (KDs) as well as engagement of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) with phosphoserine (pS)/phosphothreonine (pT)-containing sequences by means of their C-terminal polo-box domains (PBDs) [2]. While Plks 1–3 share significant homology, Plk4 is more distantly related [3,4]. The association of Plk1 over-expression with neoplastic transformation and tumor aggressiveness has defined it as a potentially promising anticancer molecular target [5,6,7,8]. To date, issues of collateral cytotoxicity have arisen for Plk1 kinase inhibitors. This is in part due to a lack of selectivity arising from the general homology among kinase catalytic domains. Given the uniqueness of PBDs to the Plk family, targeting PBD-mediated PPIs may allow down-regulation of Plk1 function with greater kinome selectivity than with inhibitors directed at the KD. However, Plk2 and Plk3 have roles in checkpoint-mediated cell-cycle arrest and maintenance of genetic stability, and they may serve as potential tumor suppressors [3,4,9]. Therefore, in developing PBD-binding inhibitors, it is desirable that they are selective for Plk1 versus Plk2 and Plk3. Because of the high homology among the PBDs of Plks 1–3, achieving selectivity for the PBD of Plk1 presents an important and challenging objective [7,8,10,11,12,13].

In designing Plk1 PBD-binding inhibitors, we have previously started with the polo-box interacting protein 1 (PBIP1)-derived 5-mer PLHSpT (1) (Figure 1) [7,14]. We found that up to 1000-fold enhancement of Plk1 PBD-binding affinity can be achieved by appending alkylphenyl groups from the His N(π)-position (as exemplified by 2a) [15]. A crystal structure of PBD-bound 2a revealed that the alkylphenyl group is situated within a hydrophobic aromatic box defined by residues Y417, Y421, Y481, L478, F482 and Y485. This may be considered as being “cryptic” in nature, since it is revealed by rotation of the Y481 side chain [15]. We have reached the pocket from parent 1 by a variety of approaches, including tethering alkylphenyl groups from the Pro residue [16], an amino-terminal N-alkyl Gly residue [17] and from macrocyclic variants [18,19]. The pocket can also be accessed from more extended peptides, such as the amino-terminal Phe residue of the PBIP1-derived peptide FDPPLHSpTA [20,21,22].

Figure 1.

The polo-box interacting protein 1 (PBIP) pT78-derived peptide 1 and related derivatives discussed in the text.

The ability to engage the cryptic pocket has been a critical element of the highest affinity PBD-binding ligands reported to date. Within this context, the pT-2 position arguably represents the most efficient position from which to achieve this access, since it is the most proximal residue to the critical “SpT” recognition motif [23]. By examining a variety of non-proteinogenic amino acid residues at the pT-2 position, we found that the highest affinities were shown by those peptides having alkylation at the His-N(π) position, which provided approximately 50-fold higher affinity than alkylation at the isomeric His-N(τ)position (peptides 2a and 4a, respectively, Figure 1) [24]. Yet, optimizing these interactions has been made difficult due to the tediousness of preparing individual His-N(π)-alkyl analogs. In response to these challenges, we employed an oxime-based post-solid phase peptide diversification strategy that allowed us to screen more than 80 analogs. Ligands such as 2b resulted, which show enhanced Plk1 PBD affinity or selectivity relative to parent 2a [25,26].

The utility of 1,2,3-triazoles for introducing conformational constraint in peptidomimetic chemistry has been reported [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. A triazole replacement of the imidazole ring in His has been used to prepare constrained His mimics [36]. More recently, triazole-based His mimetics bearing long-chain alkylphenyl groups have been examined within the context of non-peptidic Plk1 PBD inhibitors [37]. However, the best of these constructs showed Plk1 PBD-binding affinities that were 5- to 18-fold less potent than 1 (which itself exhibits 3-orders of magnitude less affinity than 2a) [37]. Herein, we report the use of on-resin azide-alkyne cycloaddition reactions to introduce 1,2,3-triazole functionality into potent lead Plk1 PBD inhibitors based on 2a [15] and 2b [25,26]. The triazole rings were intended either to induce conformational constraint (3a–3d) or to serve as a His mimetic (4b). This work has allowed us to prepare in facile fashion, new ligands that retain the high Plk1 PBD-binding affinity of the parent peptide, while enhancing selectivity for the PBD of Plk1 relative to the PBDs of Plk2 and Plk3.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

Benzylazides 9a–9d were prepared using S_N2 reactions of sodium azide with commercially available benzyl bromides 8a–8c and freshly prepared 8d (Scheme 1). Bromide 8d was synthesized in three steps from commercially available 2,6-difluorobenzylaldehyde (5). Displacement of one fluoro group in 5 by phenol afforded 6 [25], which was then reduced with sodium borohydride to yield alcohol 7. Application of the Appel reaction [38] using carbon tetrabromide and triphenylphosphine afforded bromide 8d (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Preparation of azides 9a–9d. Reagents and Conditions: i) PhOH, K₂CO₃, dimethylacetamide (DMA), 165 °C; ii) NaBH₄, MeOH; iii) CBr₄, PPh₃, CH₃CN; iv) NaN₃, acetone:H₂O (5:1).

The protected N(π)-alkyne-labeled His derivative 11 was easily obtained by alkylating N^α-Fmoc-N^τ-Trt-l-His 2,4-dimethoxylbenzyl ester (10) [25] with hex-5-yn-1-ol according to our previously reported methodology [39]. This was then used to prepare the fully protected alkyne-containing peptide 12 on NovaSyn^® TGR resin by standard Fmoc solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) protocols in N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) (Scheme 2). Resin 12 was subsequently subjected to Cu(I) catalyzed [3 + 2] cycloaddition reactions (on-resin CuAAC) with the related benzylazides 9a–9d (Scheme 2). The regioselective CuAAC reaction has been an important advance that provides a reliable means for selectively assembling 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles [40,41,42]. The resins were cleaved using a cocktail solution of TFA:H₂O:triisopropylsilane (TIS) (95:2.5:2.5) to provide the triazole-containing peptides 3a–3d following HPLC purification. Alkyne-labeled peptide 13 was prepared by cleavage of 12 directly.

Scheme 2.

Preparation of triazole-containing peptides 3a–3d and alkyne-labeled peptide 13. Reagents and Conditions: i) CH≡C(CH₂)₄OH, trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride (Tf₂O), N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIEA), dichloromethane (DCM); ii) trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), triisopropylsilane (TIS); iii) Bn-N₃ (9a–9d), CuI, l-ascorbic acid, dimethylformamide (DMF):BuOH:Pyr (3:5:2); iv) TFA:H₂O:TIS (95:2.5:2.5).

Preparation of the triazole-based His mimetic containing peptide 4b and alkyne-labeled peptide 17 are shown in Scheme 3. Protected 15 was prepared on NovaSyn^® TGR resin using commercially available Fmoc-l-propargylglycine (14) and standard Fmoc SPPS protocols. Cleavage of resin 15 and HPLC purification yielded alkyne-containing peptide 17 directly. Alternatively, an on-resin CuAAC reaction of 15 with phenyloctylazide 16 followed by resin cleavage gave peptide 4b after HPLC purification (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3.

Preparation of triazole-containing peptides 4b and alkyne-labeled peptide 17. Reagents and Conditions: i) Ph(CH₂)₈N₃ (16), CuI, l-ascorbic acid, DMF:BuOH:Pyr (3:5:2); ii) Cp*RuCl(PPh₃)₂, Ph(CH₂)₈N₃ (16), DMF; iii) TFA:H₂O:TIS (95:2.5:2.5).

It was our original intent to prepare both 1,4-substituted and 1,5-substituted triazoles as mimetics of the isomeric N(τ)- and N(π)-alkylated His analogs, respectively. As stated above, the CuAAC reaction provides a reliable means for selectively assembling 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles [40,41,42]. Accordingly, when we subjected resin-bound alkyne-containing peptide 15 to CuAAC-catalyzed cycloaddition with phenyloctylazide 16, we obtained a peptide following resin cleavage and HPLC purification, whose structure we assigned as 4b (Scheme 3). Alternatively, the ruthenium-catalyzed cycloaddition of azides with alkynes (RuAAC) has been reported to regioselectively yield 1,5-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles [43,44]. Based on this, we used the on-resin RuAAC-catalyzed [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of the alkyne group of resin 15 and azide 16 with the expectation of obtaining the isomeric 1,5-substituted triazole 18 (Scheme 3). However, the resulting peptide was identical in all respects with peptide 4b (¹H-, ¹³C- and ³¹P-NMR). At this point, a search of the literature revealed that a simple method has been reported, which permits reliable establishment of triazole regio-substitution based on chemical shifts in one-dimensional ¹³C-NMR spectra [45]. The C5 signal of 1,4-disubstituted-1H-1,2,3-triazoles characteristically appears at approximately δ = 120 ppm, while the C4 signal of 1,5-disubstituted-1H-1,2,3-triazoles is usually found at δ = 133 ppm. In our case, the products obtained from both CuAAC and RuAAC chemistries provided a diagnostic signal of δ = 123.04 ppm, indicating that the 1,4-substituted triazole (4b) was obtained in both cases.

2.2. Biological Evaluation

We employed fluorescence polarization (FP) assays to evaluate binding affinities against the isolated PBDs of Plk1, Plk2 and Plk3 (Table 1, Figure S1 in Supplementary Material). Compared with the parent peptide 1 (IC₅₀ = 650 nM) replacement of the His imidazole ring with an alkyne group resulted in an approximate 2-fold loss of Plk1 PBD-binding affinity (17, IC₅₀ = 1000 nM, Table 1). Interestingly, peptide 13 (IC₅₀ = 1100 nM) showed equivalent Plk1 PBD-binding affinity, in spite of the fact that it included a hex-5-yn-1-yl moiety at the His N(π)-position. This group would be expected to partially engage the hydrophobic channel leading to the cryptic pocket. We have previously shown that peptides 2a and 2b exhibit binding affinities (IC₅₀ values of approximately 15 nM) that are significantly more potent than parent peptide 1 (approximately 650 nM) [25,26]. Peptides 2a and 2b show more than 10-fold selectivity for Plk1 relative to Plk2 and approximately 70-fold and 20-fold over Plk3, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1.

Inhibitory potencies of peptides containing different linkers using a fluorescence polarization (FP) assay. Polo-like kinase (Plk), polo-box domain (PBD).

Peptide	R	IC50 (nM)
		PLK1 PBD	PLK2 PBD	PLK3 PBD
1 i		650 ± 39	ND iv	ND
17		1000 ± 140	ND	ND
13		1100 ± 45	ND	ND
2a ii		15 ± 0.94	220 ± 15	1100 ± 230
2b iii		15 ± 0.33	180 ± 14	450 ± 87
3a		110 ± 6.6	ND	ND
3b		100 ± 19	ND	ND
3c		130 ± 9.8	ND	ND
3d		25 ± 1.6	5900 ± 420	9900 ± 2200
4b		17 ± 0.17	690 ± 20	3400 ± 130

ⁱ See reference [14]; ⁱⁱ See reference [15]; ⁱⁱⁱ See references [25,26]; ^iv Not determined.

Peptides 3a–3d represent a series of analogs having 1,4-substituted triazoles tethered from the His N(π)-position by –(CH₂)₄– chains. Similar to 2a and 2b, this results in a total chain extension of 8-units between the His N(π)-nitrogen and the terminal aryl group. We had previously shown that this is an optimal length by examining a series of sequentially lengthened tethers [15]. Introducing a 4-fluoro substituent (3b, IC₅₀ = 100 nM, Table 1) or 3-chloro-4-fluoro substituents (3c, IC₅₀ = 130 nM, Table 1) were intended to potentially enhance interactions with the hydrophobic cryptic pocket. However, these did not significantly alter affinity relative to 3a. The reasons for this are not clear. Although peptide 3a was designed to mimic peptide 2a, it shows an approximate 8-fold relative loss of Plk1 PBD-binding affinity (3a, IC₅₀ = 110 nM, Table 1). In contrast to the marked loss of affinity incurred by introducing the triazole ring to 2a, the triazole-containing mimetic of 2b showed good retention of Plk1 PBD-binding (3d, IC₅₀ = 25 nM). While peptides 3a–3c contain a single tethered phenyl ring, peptide 3d has a bis-aryl system. The greater extension afforded by this latter arrangement may permit better retention of binding interactions with the cryptic pocket than is afforded by peptides have a single phenyl ring. Importantly, 3d showed extremely high selectivity for Plk1 relative to Plk2 (IC₅₀ = 5900 nM) and Plk3 (IC₅₀ = 9900 nM) (Table 1).

In contrast to peptides 3a–3d, where triazole rings were inserted into His-N(π)-tethered chains to potentially induce conformational constraint proximal to the cryptic binding pocket, peptide 4b represents a triazole mimetic of the His imidazole ring. In our previous efforts to access the cryptic pocket using a variety of amino acid derivatives at the pT-2 position, the highest affinities were obtained using His residues, with alkylation at the His-N(π) position (2a, Figure 1) being significantly preferred to alkylation at the isomeric His-N(τ) position (4a, Figure 1) [24]. In spite of the fact that the 1,4-triazole substitution pattern of 4b does not appear to optimally replicate the geometry of the His-N(π)-1,2-imidazole pattern shown by 2a, its Plk1 binding affinity (IC₅₀ = 17 nM) equals that of 2a (Table 1). The Plk1 PBD selectivity of 4b is slightly better than 2a against the Plk2 and Plk3 PBDs (690 nM and 3400 nM, respectively).

It is known that auto-inhibitory interdomain interactions between the KD and PBD can result in decreased potencies in assays that employ full-length Plk1 relative to assays that use isolated PBD preparations, which lack a KD component [23]. The selectivity data shown in Table 1 were obtained using fluorescence polarization assays with isolated PBDs. In contrast, Table 2 shows binding data from an ELISA assay employing full-length Plk1 (Figure S2 in Supplementary Material). Peptides possessing His-N(π)-tethered chains showed an approximate order-of-magnitude potency reduction in the full-length assay relative to the isolated PBD assay (27-fold and 19-fold reductions for 2a and 2b, respectively). However, triazole-containing peptides experienced significantly greater losses of inhibitory potency (160-fold for 4b and 480-fold for 3d). The larger differences may indicate a reduced ability of these peptides to effectively relieve auto-inhibition or to engage the PBD cryptic pocket in the full-length construct.

Table 2.

PBD-binding affinities of peptides against full-length Plk1 using an ELISA assay.

Peptide	IC50 (nM)
2a i	400 ± 32 (27×) iii
2b ii	290 ± 6.7 (19×)
3d	12000 ± 2100 (480×)
4b	2700 ± 190 (159×)

ⁱ See reference [15]; ⁱⁱ See references [25,26]; ⁱⁱⁱ Fold-change relative to isolated PBD value.

Although there are no crystals structure of full-length Plk1, which might clarify the mechanisms of autoinhibition, a co-crystal structure of Map205-stabilized isolated Plk1 KD and PBD has been solved (PDB accession code: 4J7B) [46]. In this structure the KD is situated on the face of the PBD opposite the phosphopeptide-binding site. In such an orientation, the KD displaces downward an extended loop of the PBD (residues 490–510) from where it is typically observed in isolated PBD crystal structures with bound phosphopeptides. This conformational change prevents the loop from participating in an extensive network of water-mediated hydrogen bonds with the peptide phosphate group. This may be related to the ability of the KD to inhibit ligand binding to the PBD in full-length Plk1. It is unclear from this how access to the cryptic pocket would be adversely impacted in full-length Plk1 or why the triazole-containing peptides would be more sensitive to these effects. However, it is intriguing that this loop originates from the αB helix (residues 470–489), which forms an important component of the cryptic binding pocket.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Synthesis

3.1.1. General Procedures

As previously reported [26], proton (¹H) and carbon (¹³C) NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian 400 MHz spectrometer or a Varian 500 MHz spectrometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and are reported in ppm relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS) and referenced to the solvent in which the spectra were collected. Solvent was removed by rotary evaporation under reduced pressure and anhydrous solvents were obtained commercially and used without further drying. Purification by silica gel chromatography was performed using Combiflash instruments (Telenyde ISCO, Lincoln, NE, USA) with EtOAc-hexanes or CH₂Cl₂-MeOH solvent systems. Preparative high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) was conducted using a Waters Prep LC4000 system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) having photodiode array detection and C18 columns (catalogue No. 00G4436-P0-AX, 250 mm × 21.2 mm 10 μm particle size, 110 Å pore, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) at a flow rate of 10 mL/min. Binary solvent systems consisting of A = 0.1% aqueous TFA and B = 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile were employed with gradients as indicated. Products were obtained as amorphous solids following lyophilization. Electrospray ionization-mass spectra (ESI-MS) were acquired with an Agilent LC/MSD system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a multimode ion source. High resolution mass spectrometric (HRMS, ThermoFisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA) were acquired by LC/MS-ESI with a LTQ-Orbitrap-XL at 30 K resolution.

3.1.2. Synthesis of 2-Fluoro-6-phenoxybenzaldehyde (6)

According to the literatures [25,47], to a solution of 2,6-difluorobenzaldehyde (5) (11 mL, 102 mmol) and phenol (9.6 g, 102 mmol) in dimethylacetamide (DMA) (50 mL) was added potassium carbonate (14 g, 102 mmol) and the mixture was heated and refluxed (165 °C, 2 h). The mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with H₂O (100 mL), extracted with CH₂Cl₂ and the combined organic extract was dried (Na₂SO₄) and concentrated. The resulting residue was purified by silica gel chromatography to afford product 6 as a colorless oil (14.1 g, 64% yield). ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 10.52 (s, 1H), 7.47–7.40 (m, 3H), 7.23 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 6.89–6.85 (m, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H). ¹³C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 186.79 (1C, d, J = 2.3 Hz), 162.90 (1C, d, J = 263.4 Hz), 160.50 (1C, d, J = 5.2 Hz), 155.63, 135.73 (1C, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 130.19 (2C), 124.90, 119.85 (2C), 116.03 (1C, d, J = 9.5 Hz), 113.48 (1C, d, J = 3.7 Hz), 110.81 (d, J = 21.2 Hz). ESI-MS m/z: 239.0 [M + Na⁺].

3.1.3. Synthesis of (2-Fluoro-6-phenoxyphenyl)methanol (7)

To a solution of 2-fluoro-6-phenoxybenzaldehyde (6) (5.9 g, 27 mmol) in MeOH (100 mL) was added sodium borohydride (1.0 g, 27 mmol) portion-wise at 0 °C and the mixture was stirred (0 °C, 30 min), then concentrated. The resulting residue was partitioned between EtOAc and brine, dried (Na₂SO₄), concentrated and purified by silica gel chromatography to afford product 7 as a colorless oil (5.7 g, 96% yield). ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 7.40–7.37 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.16 (m, 2H), 7.06–7.04 (m, 2H), 6.86 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 4.85 (s, 2H).¹³C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 161.70 (1C, d, J = 247.3 Hz), 156.95 (1C, d, J = 7.4 Hz), 156.62, 129.98 (2C), 129.57 (1C, d, J = 10.5 Hz), 124.02, 119.41 (1C, d, J = 18.0 Hz), 119.04 (2C), 113.77 (1C, d, J = 3.3 Hz), 110.48 (1C, d, J = 22.6 Hz), 54.02 (1C, d, J = 5.1 Hz).

3.1.4. Synthesis of 2-(Bromomethyl)-1-fluoro-3-phenoxybenzene (8d)

According to the literature [38], triphenylphosphine (10 g, 39 mmol) was added to a solution of (2-fluoro-6-phenoxyphenyl)-methanol (7) (5.7 g, 26 mmol) in acetonitrile (70 mL) and the suspension was cooled to 0 °C and carbon tetrabromide (13 g, 39 mmol) was added. The suspension turned to a clear brown solution and then to a white suspension after 2 min. The reaction suspension was stirred (room temperature, 30 min), then diluted with EtOAc and the organic phase was concentrated and purified by silica gel chromatography to provide product 8d as a colorless oil (7.4 g, 99% yield). ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 7.43–7.40 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.19 (m, 2H), 7.12–7.09 (m, 2H), 6.86 (t, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.63 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.70 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 2H). ¹³C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 161.56 (1C, d, J = 250.5 Hz), 156.91 (1C, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 156.34, 130.16 (1C, d, J = 10.5 Hz), 129.98 (2C), 124.30, 119.61 (2C), 117.10 (1C, d, J = 17.2 Hz), 113.42 (1C, d, J = 3.2 Hz), 110.11 (1C, d, J = 21.6 Hz), 20.10 (1C, d, J = 5.4 Hz).

3.1.5. General Procedure A for the Synthesis of Azides 9a–9d and 16

To a solution of bromides 8a–8d or commercially available (8-bromooctyl)benzene (7.0 mmol) in acetone (10 mL) and H₂O (2.0 mL) was added sodium azide (1.8 g, 28 mmol) and the mixture was stirred (55 °C, 15 h). The reaction was quenched by the addition of H₂O, extracted with Et₂O and the combined organic phase was washed with brine, dried (Na₂SO₄), concentrated and purified by silica gel chromatography to provide the target azides 9a–9d, and 16.

3.1.6. Synthesis of (Azidomethyl)benzene (9a)

According to the literature [48], treatment of (bromomethyl)benzene (8a) [48] as outlined in general procedure A provided title compound 9a as a colorless oil (57% yield). ESI-MS m/z: 106.1 (MH⁺ − N₂).

3.1.7. Synthesis of 1-(Azidomethyl)-4-fluorobenzene (9b)

Treatment of 1-(bromomethyl)-4-fluorobenzene (8b) as outlined in general procedure A provided the title compound 9b as a colorless oil (82% yield). ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 7.32 (dd, J = 8.4, 5.4 Hz, 2H), 7.10 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 4.34 (s, 2H). ESI-MS m/z: 124.1 (MH⁺ − N₂).

3.1.8. Synthesis of 4-(Azidomethyl)-2-chloro-1-fluorobenzene (9c)

Treatment of 4-(bromomethyl)-2-chloro-1-fluorobenzene (8c) as outlined in general procedure A provided the title compound 9c as a colorless oil (49% yield). ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 7.40 (dd, J = 6.9, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (ddd, J = 7.0, 4.7, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (s, 2H). ¹³C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ157.94 (d, J = 249.9 Hz), 132.53 (d, J = 4.0 Hz), 130.37, 127.85 (d, J = 7.3 Hz), 121.46 (d, J = 18.0 Hz), 116.96 (d, J = 21.4 Hz), 53.54. ESI-MS m/z: 158.1 (MH⁺ − N₂)

3.1.9. Synthesis of 2-(Azidomethyl)-1-fluoro-3-phenoxybenzene (9d)

Treatment of 2-(bromomethyl)-1-fluoro-3-phenoxybenzene (8d) as outlined in general procedure A provided the title compound 9d as a colorless oil (58% yield). ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 7.79 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.67–7.63 (m, 1H), 7.61–7.57 (m, 1H), 7.47–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.28 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.91 (s, 2H). ¹³C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 162.04 (d, J = 248.7 Hz), 157.26 (d, J = 7.0 Hz), 156.14, 130.29 (d, J = 10.5 Hz), 130.00 (2C), 124.30, 119.47 (2C), 114.17 (d, J = 18.2 Hz), 113.12 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 110.09 (d, J = 22.2 Hz), 42.55 (d, J = 4.0 Hz). ESI-MS m/z: 216.1 (MH⁺ − N₂).

3.1.10. Synthesis of (8-Azidooctyl)benzene (16)

Treatment of commercially available (8-bromooctyl)benzene as outlined in general procedure A provided the title compound 16 as a colorless oil (68% yield). ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 7.32–7.28 (m, 2H), 7.22–7.18 (m, 3H), 3.28 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.64 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 1.66–1.58 (m, 4H), 1.41–1.33 (m, 8H). ¹³C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 142.82, 128.39 (2C), 128.23 (2C), 125.59, 51.49, 35.96, 31.45, 29.34, 29.19, 29.08, 28.84, 26.71. ESI-MS m/z: 204.2 (MH⁺ − N₂).

3.1.11. Synthesis of N^α-(((9H-Fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)-N^π-(hex-5-yn-1-yl)-l-histidine (11)

As previously reported [39], to a solution of trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride (2.8 mL, 2.8 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (5.0 mL) was added a solution of hex-5-yn-1-ol (0.31 mL, 2.8 mmol) and N-ethyl-N-isopropylpropan-2-amine (0.49 mL, 2.8 mmol, 1.0 M in CH₂Cl₂) in CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL) dropwise under argon at −78 °C and the mixture was stirred at −78 °C (20 min). To this was added a solution of (S)-2,4-dimethoxybenzyl 2-((((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)amino)-3-(1-trityl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)propanoate (10) [24] (2.0 g, 2.5 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (5.0 mL) at −78 °C and the mixture was allowed to come to room temperature and stirred (overnight). The solvent was removed by evaporation and a solution of TFA:TIS (10:1, 10 mL) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature (2 h). The reaction mixture was concentrated and the resulting residue was purified by silica gel chromatography to provide the title compound 11 as a colorless sticky oil (0.53 g, 46% yield). ESI-MS m/z: 458.2 (MH⁺).

3.2. Peptide Synthesis

3.2.1. General Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis (SPPS)

As previously reported [26], the protected amino acids used were Fmoc-l-Thr(PO(OBzl)OH)-OH, Fmoc-l-Ser(O^tBu)-OH, Fmoc-l-Leu-OH, and Fmoc-l-Pro-OH (purchased from Novabiochem, MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA). Peptides were synthesized on a NovaSyn^® TGR resin (Novabiochem Cat#. 855009) using standard Fmoc SPPS protocols in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP). Coupling reagents used were 1-[bis(dimethylamino)methylene]-1H-1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-b]pyridinium 3-oxid hexafluorophosphate (HATU) (5.0 equivalents) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) (10 equivalents). Non-coded amino acid residues were coupled using 2.5 equivalents amino acids. Deprotection was performed using 20% piperidine in DMF (15 min, twice). Amino-terminal acetylation was performed using 1-acetylimidazole. Finished resins were washed with NMP, MeOH, CH₂Cl₂, and Et₂O, dried under vacuum and cleaved by treatment with a solution of TFA:H₂O:TIS (95:2.5:2.5) (5 h). The resin was removed by filtration, and the filtrate was concentrated under vacuum and the resulting residue was dissolved in 50% aqueous acetonitrile (5 mL) and purified by reverse-phase HPLC as outline above in General Synthetic Procedures.

3.2.2. Synthesis of Peptides 3a–3d and 4b Using On-resin Copper-catalyzed Alkyne-azide Cycloaddition Reaction (CuAAC)

By sequential coupling, Fmoc-Thr(PO(OBzl)OH)-OH, Fmoc-Ser(O^tBu)-OH, alkynyl-labelled N(π)-alkylated Fmoc-His-OH (11) or Fmoc-l-propargylglycine (14), Fmoc-Leu-OH, and Fmoc-Pro-OH were loaded onto NovaSyn^® TGR resin using the general SPPS protocols outlined above. The pre-loaded resin (12 or 15, 0.02 mmol) was mixed with a solution of azides (9a–9d or 16) (0.14 mmol), copper(I) iodide (0.26 mmol), DIEA (0.34 mmol) and l-ascorbic acid (0.14 mmol) in BuOH:DMF:pyridine (5:3:2, 1.5 mL) and the mixture was stirred (17 h). The resin was washed with NMP, MeOH, CH₂Cl₂, and Et₂O, dried under vacuum and then cleaved by treatment with a solution of TFA:H₂O:TIS (95:2.5:2.5) (5 h). The resin was removed by filtration and the filtrate was concentrated under vacuum and the resulting residue was subjected to preparative HPLC purification.

3.2.3. Synthesis of Peptide 4b Using On-resin Ruthenium-catalyzed Alkyne-azide Cycloaddition Reaction (RuAAC)

According to literature [36,49], pre-loaded alkyne-labeled NovaSyn^® TGR resin 15 (0.049 mmol) was mixed with Cp*RuCl(PPh₃)₂ [pentamethylcyclopentadienylbis(triphenylphosphine) ruthenium (II) chloride] (0.049 mmol) in DMF (1.0 mL) at room temperature (1 h). A solution of (8-azidooctyl)benzene (16) (56 mg, 0.24 mmol) in DMF (1.0 mL) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature (24 h). The resulting dark brown resin was washed with NMP, MeOH, CH₂Cl₂, and Et₂O, dried under vacuum and cleaved by treatment with a solution of TFA:H₂O:TIS (95:2.5:2.5) (5 h). The resin was removed by filtration and the filtrate was concentrated under vacuum and the resulting residue was purified by preparative HPLC.

3.2.4. Peptide Data

Peptide3a. Linear gradient of 0% B to 80% B over 30 min, retention time = 16.0 min. ESI-MS m/z: 888.4 (MH⁺). HRMS calcd C₃₉H₅₉N₁₁O₁₁P(MH⁺), 888.4128; found, 888.4139.

Peptide3b. Linear gradient of 0% B to 80% B over 30 min, retention time = 16.4 min. ESI-MS m/z: 906.4 (MH⁺). HRMS calcd C₃₉H₅₈FN₁₁O₁₁P (MH⁺), 906.4033; found, 906.4045.

Peptide3c. Linear gradient of 0% B to 80% B over 30 min, retention time = 17.0 min. ESI-MS m/z: 940.3 (MH⁺). HRMS calcd C₃₉H₅₇ClFN₁₁O₁₁P (MH⁺), 940.3644; found, 940.3650.

Peptide3d. Linear gradient of 0% B to 80% B over 30 min, retention time = 17.8 min. ESI-MS m/z: 998.2 (MH⁺). HRMS calcd C₄₅H₆₂FN₁₁O₁₂P(MH⁺), 998.4296; found, 998.4311.

Peptide4b. Linear gradient of 0% B to 80% B over 30 min, retention time = 22.6 min. ESI-MS m/z: 864.4 (MH⁺). HRMS calcd C₃₉H₆₃N₉O₁₁P (MH⁺): 864.4379; found, 864.4365.

Peptide13. Linear gradient of 0% B to 80% B over 30 min, retention time = 14.8 min. ESI-MS m/z: 755.3 (MH⁺). HRMS calcd C₃₂H₅₂N₈O₁₁P (MH⁺): 755.3488; found, 755.3497.

Peptide17. Linear gradient of 0% B to 80% B over 30 min, retention time = 15.0 min. ESI-MS m/z: 633.2 (MH⁺). HRMS calcd C₂₅H₄₂N₆O₁₁P (MH⁺), 633.2644; found, 633.2625.

3.3. Determination of Binding Selectivity against the PBDs of Plks 1–3 Using Fluorescence Polarization

3.3.1. Expression and Purification of Isolated PBDs of Plks 1–3 for Fluorescence Polarization Assays

As previously reported [25,26,50], a plasmid encoding myc-tagged Plk1 PBD was purchased from Addgene (Plasmid #41162, Watertown, MA, USA) [51]. Plasmids encoding the myc-tagged PBDs of Plk2 and Plk3 were generous gifts from Prof. Erich Nigg (Univ. of Basel, Basel, Switzerland) [51]. ~20 M HEK (human embryonic kidney)-293T cells (2 × 15 cm plates) were transfected with each plasmid using TurboFect reagent. Following 24 h expression, cells were harvested, lysed in buffer [phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) containing 0.5% NP-40 and protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail] using freeze/thaw cycles (3×) and centrifuged at 12,500× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant containing expressed protein was diluted into 8 mL of PBS (pH 7.4) containing protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail. This protein solution was added to a 1 mL bed of myc-agarose resin (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and allowed to bind for 2 h at 4 °C with gentle rotation. The lysate was eluted and the resin was washed 4× with 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffered saline (HBS) containing 0.05% Tween-20, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The bound PBD protein was then eluted with a 1 mg/mL solution of myc peptide (EQKLISEEDL) in HBS + 1 mM DTT and 1 mM EDTA. The purified PBD protein was dialyzed 5× with HBS + 1 mM DTT and 1 mM EDTA using a 10 kDa molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) filter (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) fixed angle rotor at 7500× g, 4 °C, 10 min). The concentration of the final protein solution was determined by absorbance at 280 nm and purity was determined by SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) with Coomassie staining.

3.3.2. Evaluation of Binding Affinities against the Isolated PBDs of Plk1, Plk2 and Plk3 Using Fluorescence Polarization Assays

As previously reported [25,26,50], isolated PBD protein was diluted to a 2× working dilution in assay buffer (HEPES-buffered saline with 0.05% Tween-20, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mM EDTA). The following final protein concentrations used were: 80 nM for Plk1 PBD; 80 nM for Plk2 PBD and 130 nM for Plk3 PBD. These concentrations represent the approximate K_d values determined for the respective fluorescence polarization probe sequences. Inhibitors were serially diluted to generate 4× working dilutions in assay buffer containing 4% DMSO. 20 μL of 2× PBD solution was added to each well of a 384-well plate (0% binding controls received 20 μL of assay buffer). 10 μL of the 4× inhibitor solution (or DMSO blank) was added to corresponding wells and allowed to pre-incubate at RT for 30 min with shaking. The following sequences were utilized as fluorescent probes: 5CF-GPMQSpTPLNG-NH₂ for Plk1 PBD; 5CF-GPMQTSpTPKNG-NH₂ for Plk2 PBD and 5CF-PLATSpTPKNG-NH₂ for Plk3 PBD [10]. Fluorescent probes were diluted to 40 nM (4×) in assay buffer and then 10 μL was added to each well. The plate was allowed to equilibrate at room temperature for (30 min) with shaking. The FP was read using a BioTek Synergy 2 plate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) with 485/20 excitation and 528/20 emission. The FP values were obtained in triplicate and normalized to 100% (no inhibitor) and 0% binding (no protein) controls. Normalized values were plotted versus concentration and analyzed using non-linear regression in GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) [log(inhibitor) vs. response-variable slope (four parameter) model]. IC₅₀ values are presented in Table 1 and represent average ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

3.4. Evaluation of Binding Affinities against Full-length Plk1 Using ELISA Assays

3.4.1. Lysate Production for ELISA-based Inhibition Assay against Full Length Plk1

Assays were conducted as previously reported [25,26,50]. To summarize, a plasmid encoding myc-tagged full-length Plk1 (Addgene, Plasmid #41160) [52] was transiently transfected into HEK (human embryonic kidney)-293T cells using the TurboFect reagent (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Following 48 h expression, cells were harvested, lysed in buffer (PBS, pH 7.4 with 0.5% NP-40 and protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail) using freeze/thaw cycles (3×) and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed to provide a crude cytosolic lysate containing overexpressed, myc-tagged Plk1 (total protein concentration determined by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay).

3.4.2. Determination of Inhibitory Potency in an ELISA Assay Using Full-Length Plk1

As previously reported [25,26,50] a biotinylated phosphopeptide (sequence: Biotin-Ahx-PMQS(pT)PLN-NH₂) was diluted to 1 µM (from a 2 mM DMSO stock solution) in PBS (pH 7.4) and loaded onto the wells of a 96-well Neutravidin-coated plate (Pierce Biotechnology, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 100 µL per well for 1 h (background control contained no biotinylated peptide). The wells were washed once with 150 µL PBST (PBS, pH 7.4 + 0.05% Tween-20), and then 100 µL of 1% BSA in PBS (pH 7.4) (blocking buffer) was added for 1 h. A cytosolic lysate-containing transiently expressed myc-tagged Plk1 protein was diluted to 300 µg/mL in PBS (pH 7.4) containing protease/phosphatase inhibitors (Pierce Biotechnology), mixed with competitive inhibitor (from a 10× stock in ~4% DMSO/PBS), and allowed to pre-incubate for 1 h (100 µL per well in a 96-well plate, 30 µg total protein). The blocked ELISA plate was washed 2× with PBST (PBS, pH 7.4 + 0.05% Tween-20) (150 µL) and the pre-incubated lysates were added to the plate and incubated (1 h). The wells were washed 4× with PBST (150 µL) and then treated with anti-myc primary antibody (1:1500 dilution in PBS, mouse monoclonal, Pierce Biotechnology) for 1 h. The wells were then washed 4× with PBST (150 µL), and incubated with rabbit anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate [1:3000 dilution in 1% (%w/v) BSA in PBS, Pierce Biotechnology] for 1 h. The wells were then washed 5× with PBST (150 µL) and incubated with Turbo TMB (3,3′,5,5′-tetramethyl benzidine substrate)-ELISA solution (Pierce Biotechnology) until the desired absorbance was reached (5–10 min). The reaction was quenched by the addition of 2 N aqueous H₂SO₄ and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a BioTek Synergy 2 96-well plate reader. Absorbance was plotted versus concentration (logM) and fit to a non-linear regression analysis using GraphPad Prism 8 software [model: log(inhibitor) vs. response-variable slope (four parameters)]. The calculated IC₅₀ values presented in Table 2 are from multiple independent experiments and were normalized and averaged to provide values ± SEM.

4. Conclusions

Presented herein are the design of the triazole-containing conformationally constrained peptides 3a–3d and the His mimic-containing peptide 4b as well as their facile preparation using on-resin azide-alkyne cycloaddition reactions. The resulting peptides were evaluated in FP binding assays using isolated PBDs of Plk1, Plk2 and Plk3 and in ELISA assays against full-length Plk1. Certain of these new ligands retain the high Plk1 PBD-binding affinity of the parent peptide 2a, while having enhanced selectivity for the PBD of Plk1 relative to the PBDs of Plk2 and Plk3. It is interesting that peptides 4b and 3d show significantly greater than anticipated reduced affinities in full-length Plk1 ELISA assays relative to values obtained with the isolated PBD (160-fold for 4b and 480-fold for 3d). The larger differences may indicate a reduced ability of these triazole-containing peptides to effectively relieve auto-inhibition arising from interdomain interactions between the KD and PBD or to engage the PBD cryptic pocket in the full-length construct. These observations are noteworthy, in that they potentially indicate structural interactions of the KD and PBD in full-length Plk1 that are not anticipated by the previous co-crystal structure of isolated KD and PBD in the presence of Map205.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material associated with this article is available online. Figures S1 and S2 reporting FP binding data against the isolated PBDs of Plk1, Plk2 and Plk3 and ELISA binding assays against full-length Plk1.

Author Contributions

X.Z.Z. designed and synthesized the peptides. K.T. and D.H. performed the biological evaluation. X.Z.Z., K.T., D.H. and T.R.B.Jr. interpreted the data and wrote the paper. All authors have approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. This work was supported in part by a JSPS Research Fellowship for Japanese Biomedical and Behavioral Researchers at NIH.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.