Table II.
Proportion (%) of hazardous drinking based on audit.
| Population group | Design weight | Weighted |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic weights |
Random forest |
Logistic regression |
|||||||||
| Estimate | Differencea |
Estimate | Differencea |
Estimate (95% CI) |
Differencea |
||||||
| Absolute | % | Absolute | % | Absolute | % | ||||||
| All | 11.4 | 11.7 | 0.3 | 2.6% | 11.4 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 11.8 (10.4, 13.2) | 0.4 | 3.4% | |
| Sex | Men | 16.9 | 17.5 | 0.6 | 3.4% | 17.3 | 0.4 | 2.3% | 17.5 (15.1, 19.9) | 0.6 | 3.4% |
| Women | 5.9 | 6.0 | 0.1 | 1.7% | 5.8 | –0.1 | –1.7% | 6.2 (4.7, 7.6) | 0.3 | 4.8% | |
| Age group (years) | 15–24 | 17.9 | 18.2 | 0.3 | 1.6% | 17.7 | –0.2 | –1.1% | 18.7 (15.0, 22.5) | 0.8 | 4.3% |
| 25–39 | 15.4 | 15.5 | 0.1 | 0.6% | 14.5 | –0.9 | –6.2% | 15.6 (12.2, 19.0) | 0.2 | 1.3% | |
| 40–54 | 12.3 | 12.3 | –0.0 | –0.0% | 12.9 | 0.6 | 4.7% | 12.3 (9.2, 15.4) | 0.0 | 0.0% | |
| 55–79 | 6.6 | 6.3 | –0.3 | –4.8% | 6.3 | –0.3 | –4.8% | 6.3 (4.6, 8.1) | –0.3 | –4.8% | |
| Educational level | Low | 11.8 | 12.4 | 0.6 | 4.8% | 12.4 | 0.6 | 4.8% | 12.6 (9.7, 15.4) | 0.8 | 6.3% |
| Middle | 13.6 | 13.8 | 0.2 | 1.4% | 13.3 | –0.3 | –2.3% | 13.7 (11.4, 16.0) | 0.1 | 0.7% | |
| High | 8.3 | 8.5 | 0.1 | 1.2% | 7.9 | –0.5 | –6.3% | 8.4 (6.2, 10.6) | 0.0 | 0.0% | |
a
Difference calculated between design weight and weight in question.
CI: confidence interval.