Table 2.
Girls (n = 174) |
Boys (n = 143) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of overweight parents |
p valueb | Number of overweight parents |
p valueb | |||||||||
0 (n = 76) | 1 (n = 74) | 2 (n = 24) | 0 (n = 61) | 1 (n = 59) | 2 (n = 23) | |||||||
Age, years | 9.5 ± 0.4 | 9.6 ± 0.4 | 9.7 ± 0.5 | 0.21 | 9.6 ± 0.4 | 9.7 ± 0.4 | 9.7 ± 0.4 | 0.40 | ||||
BMI, kg/m2 | 16.7 ± 2.2 | 17.3 ± 2.7 | 18.9 ± 2.2 | 0.001 | 16.6 ± 1.7 | 17.3 ± 2.0 | 17.9 ± 2.8 | 0.02 | ||||
BMI z-score | 0.2 ± 1.0 | 0.4 ± 1.2 | 1.2 ± 0.7 | 0.000 | 0.1 ± 1.0 | 0.5 ± 1.0 | 0.7 ± 1.2 | 0.03 | ||||
Puberty status (Tanner) | 2.2 ± 0.5 | 2.3 ± 0.6 | 2.5 ± 0.6 | 0.10 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | |||||
Physical activity, % who exercises regularly | 42.5 | 50.0 | 48.3 | 0.76 | 68.2 | 66.2 | 37.0 | 0.02 | ||||
Inactivity, h/day | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 5.7 ± 0.3 | 0.10 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 6.2 ± 0.3 | 0.52 | ||||
Father's income, % with lowest income category | 1.3 | 4.6 | 13.8 | 0.51 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 0.02 | ||||
Mother's income, % with lowest income category | 6.3 | 5.6 | 13.8 | 0.13 | 12.5 | 7.7 | 3.6 | 0.36 | ||||
Total EI, MJ/day | 9.0 ± 1.8 | 8.7 ± 2.2 | 9.0 ± 2.3 | 0.76 | 9.4 ± 2.7 | 9.5 ± 2.2 | 9.7 ± 2.5 | 0.91 | ||||
Total fat intake, g/day | 78.5 ± 19.5 | 75.6 ± 27.1 | 82.0 ± 34.7 | 0.52 | 79.4 ± 28.3 | 84.5 ± 27.9 | 87.9 ± 38.9 | 0.44 | ||||
FE% | 33.6 ± 5.6 | 32.7 ± 7.3 | 34.2 ± 9.0 | 0.56 | 32.0 ± 5.7 | 33.5 ± 7.7 | 34.0 ± 6.9 | 0.32 | ||||
Birth weight, g | 3,333 ± 463 | 3,284 ± 591 | 3,445 ± 434 | 0.42 | 3,451 ± 494 | 3,382 ± 643 | 3,536 ± 481 | 0.52 |
FE% = fat energy percent.
Numbers are means ± SD at baseline where nothing else is stated.
p values reflect ANOVA one-way variance analysis, test for difference between 0, 1 and 2 overweight parents.