Heo 2015.
Methods | Participants were randomly allocated for radiographic inspection and treatment with or without kinesiotaping by drawing lots Blinding unknown |
|
Participants | 1 centre in Republic of Korea 44 participants 100% with dysphagia and stroke within 3 months of diagnosis Baseline characteristics similar |
|
Interventions | Rx: kinesiotaping C: no kinesiotaping |
|
Outcomes | Kinematic analysis of movement of the hyoid bone (movements measured in both horizontal and vertical sections) Angular variation of the epiglottis using human anatomy‐based co‐ordinates Swallow score: FDS |
|
Notes | Exclusions: none | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Participants randomly allocated by drawing lots |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Blinding unclear |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified |