Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 30;2018(10):CD000323. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000323.pub3

Kim 2012ii.

Methods (Low‐frequency data set vs control)
Participants As data set 1
Interventions Low‐frequency rTMS = 10
 Control (sham stimulation) = 5
Outcomes As data set 1
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of randomisation unclear
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk None lost to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk None identified