Power 2006.
Methods | Method of randomisation unclear CT scans analysed by a neuroradiologist who was blinded to patients' clinical presentation and videofluoroscopic swallowing status Baseline data not including dysphagia severity of baseline groups |
|
Participants | 1 centre in UK 16 participants |
|
Interventions | Rx: actual electrical stimulation following threshold setting exercise to faucial pillars C: single episode of sham electrical stimulation following threshold setting exercise | |
Outcomes | Changes on videofluoroscopy 60 minutes post intervention | |
Notes | Exclusions: prior dysphagia, intercurrent illness, other neurological disease | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of randomisation unclear |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified |