Xia 2016a.
Methods | Randomisation by random numbered tables Outcomes blinded |
|
Participants | 1 centre in China
124 participants, timing post stroke unclear but suggests acute based on mean days from onset of stroke
Dysphagia identified by videofluoroscopy and Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale No significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups |
|
Interventions | Rx: combined acupuncture with standard swallowing training (n = 62)
C: standard swallowing training only (n = 62) Treatment for 4 weeks |
|
Outcomes | Primary: Standardized Swallowing Assessment, Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale Secondary: Modified BI, Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL‐QOL) |
|
Notes | Exclusion: presence of serious diseases of the liver, kidney, hematological system, or endocrine system; psychiatric disorders; severe cognitive impairment; severe aphasia; other diseases that potentially impaired swallowing function, such as head and neck tumours, oesophageal neoplasms, craniocerebral injury, myasthenia gravis, and Guillain‐Barre syndrome | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation by random numbers table |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Blinding unclear |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcome assessors blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 4 participant dropouts from study in total |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified |