Table 1. Previous studies of vessel diameter, mean velocity and mean flow rate in first-generation retinal blood vessels radiating out of optic disk in normal mice.
Study | Technique | Species | Class | Nm | Nv | D (µm) | Vm (mm s–1) | Fm per vessel (µL min–1) | TRBF (µL min−1retina−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current study | Adaptive optics line-scan | 15–73 week old C57BL/6J mice | A | 7 | 11 | 25.9 ± 4.6 a
(20.1–37.7) |
15.0 ± 4.0 a
(9.9–23.1) |
0.52 ± 0.36 a
(0.22–1.55) |
1.56–3.64 a1 |
V | 6 | 7 | 30.6 ± 8.4 a
(22.8–45.8) |
11.4 ± 3.0 a
(8.6–17.0) |
0.57 ± 0.42 a
(0.24–1.30) |
1.71–3.99 a1 | |||
Liu et al., 2017 | Dual ring scanning Doppler vis-OCT | 13 week old non-diabetic TSP1-/- mice | A | 7 | 21–49 ^ | 40.1 ± 1.8 * | - b | - | 1.86 ± 0.24 * |
V | 7 | 21–49 ^ | - | - | - | - | |||
Blair et al., 2016 | Slit lamp biomicroscope | 24 week old C57BL/6J mice | A | 10 | 30–70 ^ | 26 ± 2 * | - | - | - |
V | 10 | 30–70 ^ | 29 ± 3 * | 8 ± 1 * | - | 1.9 ± 0.5 * | |||
Zhi et al., 2014 | En face Doppler OCT/OMAG | BTBR wild-type mice | A/V | 10 | 30–70 ^ | - | - | - | 3.05 ± 0.20 # |
Wright et al., 2012 | Intravital microscopy | 30–31 week old male C57BL/6J mice | A | 9 | 45 | 57.3 ± 1.1 # | 25.3 ± 1.3 # | 4.02 ± 0.28 # | - |
V | 9 | 45 | 62.5 ± 2.4 # | 23.2 ± 1.1 # | 4.83 ± 0.41 # | - | |||
Zhi et al., 2012 | En face Doppler OCT/OMAG | 22 week old female BTBR mice | A | 1 | 6 | - | - | 0.47 ± 0.05 c | 2.82 ± 0.30 c |
V | 1 | 6 | - | - | 0.55 ± 0.10 c | 3.27 ± 0.28 c | |||
Yadav and Harris, 2011 | Intravital Microscopy |
16 week old male C57BL/6 mice | A | 12 | 36–84 ^ | 60.0 ± 1.3 # | 30.2 ± 1.4 # | 5.29 ± 0.34 # | - |
V | 12 | 36–84 ^ | 67.6 ± 1.6 # | 28.0 ± 1.2 # | 6.39 ± 0.31 # | - | |||
Wang et al., 2011 | Intravital microscopy | 13 week old male C57BL/6 mice | A | 7 | 21–49 ^ | 56.0 ± 1.1 # | 29.0 ± 0.8 # | - | - |
V | 7 | 21–49 ^ | 66.4 ± 2.8 # | 25.1 ± 0.7 # | - | 25.08 ± 1.92 # | |||
Wang et al., 2010 | Intravital microscopy | 13–14 week old male C57BL/6 mice | A | 6 | 30–42 | 54.7 ± 1.0 # | 20.9 ± 0.7 # | 2.98 ± 0.14 # | - |
V | 6 | 30–42 | 60.8 ± 2.7 # | 21.0 ± 0.7 # | 3.86 ± 0.36 # | - | |||
Wright et al., 2009 | Intravital microscopy | 15–16 week old male C57BL/6 mice | A | 7–8 | 28–49 | 59.4 ± 0.9 # | 28.3 ± 1.4 # | - | 26.34 ± 2.52 # |
V | 7–8 | 28–49 | 69.5 ± 1.4 # | 26.3 ± 1.2 # | - | 31.80 ± 2.40 # | |||
Lee and Harris, 2008 | Intravital microscopy | 16–30 week old female euglycemic NOD mice | A | 5 | 9–13 | 61.0 ± 1.5 # | - | 3.36 ± 0.18 # | - |
V | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
Wright and Harris, 2008 | Intravital microscopy | 16 week old C57BL/6 mice | A | 7–9 d | 41–50 d | 60.4 ± 1.1 # | 23.0 ± 0.5 # | - | - |
V | 7–9 d | 37–49 d | 71.4 ± 2.9 # | - | - | - | |||
Ninomiya and Inomata, 2006 | Scanning electron microscopy (ex vivo) | 16 week old male mice | A | 10 | 80 | <28 | - | - | - |
V | - | - | - | - | - | - |