Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 9;2013(12):CD004127. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004127.pub3

Comparison 2. Noninvasive versus invasive weaning.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Weaning failure 8   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 COPD 3 351 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.52 [0.36, 0.74]
1.2 Mixed 5 254 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.73 [0.35, 1.51]