Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 9;2014(9):CD008638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008638.pub2

Comparison 8. SmartCare™ versus non‐automated weaning.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Most protracted measure of mortality (based on clinician type) 6 470 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.15 [0.74, 1.79]
1.1 RRT clinicians 3 164 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.42, 1.76]
1.2 Other clinicians 3 306 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.45 [0.73, 2.86]