Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 9;2014(9):CD008638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008638.pub2

Lim 2012.

Methods  
Participants Single‐centre study involving a coronary care unit and including participants between 21 and 85 years of age, with stable neurological status, on an assisted mode of mechanical ventilation for > 24 hours
Excluded:
  1. Poor short‐term prognosis

  2. Pregnant

  3. Haemodynamically unstable

Interventions Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to knowledge‐based weaning (SmartCare™) or usual care
APACHE II score was used to stratify illness severity
Outcomes Primary outcome: total weaning time (from inclusion to extubation without reintubation for 72 hours)
Adjusted for APACHE II score
Total duration of mechanical support
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated randomization
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sequentially numbered, sealed envelopes held by trial co‐ordinator/RRT or designate
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Study co‐ordinators collected outcome data
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No participant withdrew from the study. Only one death prevented computation of time to extubation. Total of 5 deaths occurred during the study
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Yes, reported outcomes were limited in this abstract publication. Study author provided additional data for the 62 participants ultimately included in this trial (originally 54 participants) and reported time to successful extubation and total duration of mechanical ventilation
Did the trial stop early for benefit? Low risk Stopped early for futility. Investigators sought to recruit 75 participants per study arm
Participants analysed according to the group allocated to? Low risk Yes. No participant was withdrawn following randomization, and no cross‐overs occurred; however, 1 participant who died was excluded from the outcome analyses