Han 2012.
| Methods | Multi‐centre RCT in community hospitals; China | |
| Participants | Patients with septic shock who were older than 16 years with dopamine requirements exceeding 5 µg/kg/min; 29% female, mean 72 years old, average APACHE I score 27.4, SOFA score 9.3 (N = 139) | |
| Interventions | Pituitrin (vasopressin 0.017 to 0.042 U/min) vs standard vasopressors (dopamine or norepinephrine 2 to 20 µg/kg/min) norepinephrine added to both groups to keep haemodynamics stable |
|
| Outcomes | 28‐Day survival, LOS hospital, duration mechanical ventilation; MAP, heart rate, serum creatinine, lactate, norepinephrine dose, heparin, glucocorticoids | |
| Notes | Published in Chinese; funding not stated | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated random list |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details reported |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
| Explicit in‐/exclusion criteria | Unclear risk | Only high‐level information given |
| ITT‐analysis | Low risk | Performed |
| Adequate patient description | Unclear risk | Only high‐level information on aetiology given |
| Identical care | High risk | Open‐label intervention; no treatment protocol presented |
| Outcome description | Low risk | Reported |
| Physicians blinded | High risk | Not reported, but from indirect information high risk was assumed |
| Outcome assessors blinded? | Unclear risk | Low risk for mortality outcomes, high risk for other outcomes |