Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 15;2016(2):CD003709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003709.pub4

Seguin 2006.

Methods Single‐centre randomized controlled trial, University hospital; France
Participants Adult participants with septic shock (study authors' definition)
Mean age = 66 years, 23% female
SAPS II score = 54, SOFA score = 10 (N = 22)
Interventions Dopexamine (DX) infusion 0.5 mcg/kg/min and norepinephrine (NE) infusion 0.2 mcg/kg/min
If cardiac index > 3 L/kg/min, NE increased by 0.2 mcg/kg/min every 3 minutes until MAP 70 to 80 mm Hg
If cardiac index < 3 L/kg/min, DX increased by 0.5 mcg/kg/min every 3 minutes until MAP 70 to 80 mm Hg
vs
Epinephrine infusion 0.2 mcg/kg/min. Increased by 0.2 mcg/kg/min every 3 minutes until MAP 70 to 80 mm Hg
Outcomes Gastromucosal blood flow (primary), haemodynamics, 28‐day mortality, 90‐day mortality
For the mortality analysis, we used data on 90‐day mortality
Notes Funding: This study was supported by Grant from Rennes University Hospital and Rennes 1 University, 2001 Clinical Research Program, Rennes, France
Conflict of interest: none reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Appropriately reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Appropriately reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Appropriately reported
Explicit in‐/exclusion criteria Low risk Described explicitly
ITT‐analysis High risk Not performed
Adequate patient description Low risk Adequately described
Identical care Low risk Described
Outcome description Low risk Adequately described
Physicians blinded Unclear risk No sufficient information
Outcome assessors blinded? Unclear risk No sufficient information