Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD004084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004084.pub3

Summary of findings 3. Femoral versus internal jugular insertion: short‐term catheterization for the prevention of venous thrombosis, stenosis and infection.

Femoral versus internal jugular insertion: short‐term catheterization for the prevention of venous thrombosis, stenosis and infection
Patient or population: critically ill patients who were expected to require support with renal replacement therapy
 Settings: inpatient
 Intervention: Femoral versus internal jugular insertion: short‐term haemodialysis catheterization
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control Femoral versus internal jugular insertion: short‐term catheterization
Catheter‐related infectious complications ‐ Catheter colonization Study population RR 1.04 
 (0.8 to 1.36) 637
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
249 per 1000 259 per 1000
 (199 to 339)
Moderate
249 per 1000 259 per 1000
 (199 to 339)
Catheter‐related infectious complications ‐ Catheter related bloodstream infection Study population RR 0.58 
 (0.14 to 2.4) 637
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
16 per 1000 9 per 1000
 (2 to 38)
Moderate
16 per 1000 9 per 1000
 (2 to 38)
Catheter‐related infectious complication ‐ Subgroup Analysis for the effect of BMI on catheter colonization ‐ Highest BMI tercile (>28.4) Study population RR 1.69 
 (1.08 to 2.65) 202
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
220 per 1000 372 per 1000
 (238 to 583)
Moderate
220 per 1000 372 per 1000
 (238 to 583)
Catheter‐related thrombotic complications ‐ Symptomatic deep venous thrombosis Study population RR 0.99 
 (0.14 to 6.98) 736
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
5 per 1000 5 per 1000
 (1 to 38)
Moderate
6 per 1000 6 per 1000
 (1 to 42)
Catheter‐related thrombotic complications ‐ Catheter related thrombosis Study population RR 0.46 
 (0.21 to 1.01) 151
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
227 per 1000 104 per 1000
 (48 to 229)
Moderate
227 per 1000 104 per 1000
 (48 to 229)
Immediate mechanical complications ‐ Total mechanical complications Study population RR 0.51 
 (0.29 to 0.88) 736
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
96 per 1000 49 per 1000
 (28 to 84)
Moderate
96 per 1000 49 per 1000
 (28 to 84)
Immediate mechanical complications ‐ Major mechanical complications Study population RR 0.33 
 (0.03 to 3.16) 736
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
8 per 1000 3 per 1000
 (0 to 26)
Moderate
8 per 1000 3 per 1000
 (0 to 25)
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Unclear risk of incomplete outcome data.