Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD004084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004084.pub3

Comparison 1. Internal jugular versus subclavian CVA routes: long‐term catheterization.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Catheter related infectious complications 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Exit site infection 1 200 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 7.00 [0.88, 55.86]
1.2 Port‐related bacteraemia and/or pocket infections 1 240 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.35 [0.04, 3.32]
2 Catheter related thrombotic complications 1 240 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.97 [0.87, 4.48]
3 Immediate mechanical complications 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Total mechanical complications 2 468 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.21, 4.84]
3.2 Major mechanical complications 2 468 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.01, 8.09]
4 Late mechanical complications 2 468 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.67 [0.41, 6.79]
5 Leaving the studies early 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
5.1 Cancelled operation 1 270 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 5.07 [0.25, 104.71]
5.2 Withdrew informed consent 1 270 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.03 [0.19, 22.12]
5.3 Had no data available 1 270 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.10 [0.52, 2.32]