Skip to main content
. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD005277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005277.pub3

Bennett 2003.

Methods Randomized controlled trial with allocation concealment, blinding of all participants and investigators. Analysed by intention to treat. Central computer code held by pharmacy.
Participants 180 participants with clinical DCI (excluding CAGE) from three centres.
Interventions Control: recompression on physician choice table (88% had USN TT6), placebo medication at first air break and daily for seven days, recompression as clinically indicated to plateau of symptoms or complete resolution plus one further treatment.
 Active: as above, but active medication with tenoxicam 20 mg per dose.
Outcomes Death, outcome functional score (see table 02), number of compression cycles required.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "Allocation was achieved using a computer generated, randomised schedule stratified by admission grade"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Figure 1 indicates allocation after entry into study. "Allocation was achieved using a computer generated, randomised schedule stratified by admission grade."
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "Only the trial pharmacist knew the schedule, while the investigators, subjects, treating physicians and outcome assessors were all unaware of group allocation."
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk As above
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk As above
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk ".. giving a loss at final follow‐up of 16 patients (8.9%)"
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All indicated outcomes were reported
Other bias Unclear risk Nil other bias detected