Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 15;2018(11):CD003402. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003402.pub3

Laivuori 1993.

Methods RCT (3‐arms)
Participants 18 women randomised
Inclusion criteria: women with PE (admitted to hospital between 26 and 37 weeks' gestation because of BP consistently exceeding 140/100 mmHg; 8 women also had proteinuria)
Exclusion criteria: none reported
Setting: Helsinki, Finland
Interventions SUPPLEMENTATION: omega‐3 versus LA + GLA (Primrose oil) versus placebo
Group 1: fish oil: 10 MaxEPA capsules (180 mg EPA, 120 mg DHA per capsule): total number randomised: n = 5 (3)
Group 2: primrose oil: 10 Preglandin capsules (375 mg linolenic acid and 45 mg gammalinolenic acid per capsule): total number randomised: n = 7 (4)
Group 3: placebo (10 capsules each containing 500 mg of maize oil and 500 mg olive oil); total number randomised: n = 6 (5)
All women: intervention between 31‐36 weeks' gestation; bed rest in hospital for 2 days before randomisation
Median duration and range of supplementation was:
  • fish oil: 32 days (13‐54)

  • evening primrose oil: 17 days (7‐28)

  • placebo: 24 days (14‐39)


Women were advised to follow their normal diets.
DHA + EPA dose/day: daily dose unclear
Outcomes Women/birth: prostanoids (urine); clinical signs of PE; birthweight (reported as median and range); BP (reported as % of pretreatment levels)
Notes 2 women used betablockers (metoprolol 100 mg/day) and 1 used dihydrazaline 50 mg/day. No aspirin‐like drugs were allowed.
No outcomes could be meta‐analysed
Funding: Preglandin capsules (Suomen Rohdos, Turku, Finland); MaxEpa and placebo capsules (Orion OY, Kuopio, Finland)
Declarations of interest: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Reported as “in randomized order”
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Sealed envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Capsules of identical appearance
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Not reported, but probably done.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk 6/18 (33%) women excluded: 3 women gave birth before samples could be collected and 3 additional women failed to collect adequate urine samples.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Limited number of outcomes reported.
Other bias High risk Median length of supplementation differed substantially between the 3 groups.