Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 19;2018(12):CD012470. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012470.pub2

Comparison 6. Fibreglass versus plaster cast.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Complications 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 Remanipulation: distal radius fractures only 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Remanipulation: all fractures 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.3 New cast (no remanipulation): all fractures 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.4 Cast reinforcement: all fractures 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.5 Skin irritation or pressure area: all fractures 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]