Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 18;2018(10):CD009431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009431.pub3

Matsueda 2010b.

Methods Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Multi‐centre (46). Criteria for FD: Rome II with PDS
Participants N = 462
Female: 65.4%
Mean age: range 38.0 to 40.6 years
Country: Japan
Interventions Intervention: acotiamide 50 mg, 100 mg or 300 mg three times a day
Comparator: placebo
Rescue medication: not allowed
Duration of treatment: 4 weeks
Outcomes Daily basis, 9 symptoms, on 0 to 3 severity scale, on weekly basis, global assessment of overall treatment efficacy (OTE) on 7‐point Likert scales, elimination rate of postprandial fullness by participants
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation was performed through a computer‐generated program.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Eligible participants were assigned a randomization number according to a predetermined list at each site. These numbers were allocated in sequential order and registered in the patient enrolment list, and ensured appropriate concealed allocation
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Assessed by patient who was blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Only 5% were excluded or discontinued but did not provide the reasons of exclusion, it is not clear if balanced between two groups
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Reported all pre‐defined outcomes
Other bias Low risk No other risk found