Matsueda 2010b.
Methods | Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Multi‐centre (46). Criteria for FD: Rome II with PDS | |
Participants | N = 462 Female: 65.4% Mean age: range 38.0 to 40.6 years Country: Japan |
|
Interventions | Intervention: acotiamide 50 mg, 100 mg or 300 mg three times a day Comparator: placebo Rescue medication: not allowed Duration of treatment: 4 weeks |
|
Outcomes | Daily basis, 9 symptoms, on 0 to 3 severity scale, on weekly basis, global assessment of overall treatment efficacy (OTE) on 7‐point Likert scales, elimination rate of postprandial fullness by participants | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation was performed through a computer‐generated program. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Eligible participants were assigned a randomization number according to a predetermined list at each site. These numbers were allocated in sequential order and registered in the patient enrolment list, and ensured appropriate concealed allocation |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Assessed by patient who was blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Only 5% were excluded or discontinued but did not provide the reasons of exclusion, it is not clear if balanced between two groups |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Reported all pre‐defined outcomes |
Other bias | Low risk | No other risk found |