Ho 2012.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel group trial of oral rizatriptan with an enrichment design | |
Participants | Participants were males and females aged 6–17 years who were ≥ 20kg in weight and who had at least a 6‐month history of migraine attacks with or without aura as defined by ICHD‐2, usually lasting 3 h or more (when untreated). Participants had ≥ 1 and ≤ 8 moderate to severe migraine attacks with or without aura per month in the 2 months before the screening visit, and had not, by history, experienced satisfactory relief with NSAIDs or paracetamol. Patients were excluded if they had not experienced satisfactory relief from migraine pain during prior treatment with 2 or more adequate courses of triptans. Non‐responders to placebo in stage 1 were randomized 1:1 to rizatriptan:placebo, with randomization stratified by age (6–11 years versus 12–17 years). Randomized (N = 1382); not treated (N = 405); randomized in stage 1 (N = 915); randomized in stage 2 (N = 791); withdrawn (N = 21); intention‐to‐treat and primary efficacy analysis (N = 770) |
|
Interventions | Oral‐disintegrating tablet of rizatriptan 5 mg (< 40 kg) or 10 mg (≥ 40 kg) or placebo. Participants treated within 30 min of a moderate/severe migraine attack. In stage 1, participants were randomized 20:1 to placebo or rizatriptan. In stage 2, participants with ongoing moderate/severe pain after 15 min (non‐responders) who received placebo in stage 1 were randomized 1:1 to rizatriptan or placebo. | |
Outcomes |
Other reported outcomes:
|
|
Headache severity scale | 4‐point scale (none, mild, moderate, severe) | |
Funding source | Merck | |
Publication | Journal and abstract | |
Notes | — | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: randomization process not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: allocation performed using interactive voice response system |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: no information provided |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: withdrawals are balanced between intervention groups |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: all expected outcomes reported including adverse events |