Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 15;2013(9):CD003588. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003588.pub3

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Primary analysis: less versus more frequent for intravenous administration set replacement.

Primary analysis: less versus more frequent for intravenous administration set replacement
Patient or population: patients with intravenous administration set replacement
 Settings: all acute care settings
 Intervention: primary analysis: less versus more frequent
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks Relative effect
 (95% CI) No. of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
More frequent
AS replacement
Less frequent
AS replacement
Catheter‐related BSI
as defined using criteria specified by Maki 2006; Mermel 2009; and O'Grady 2002
33 of 932 participants (3.5%) developed a catheter‐related BSI 35 of 862 participants (4.1%) developed a catheter‐related BSI RR 1.06
(0.66 to 1.68)
1794
(8 studies)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowa,b  
Infusate‐related BSI
as defined using criteria specified by O'Grady 2002
9 of 945 participants (0.95%) developed an infusate‐related BSI 11 of 902 participants (1.2%) developed an infusate‐related BSI RR 0.69 
 (0.31 to 1.51) 1847
 (11 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowa,b  
Infusate colonization
any positive quantitative culture of infusate
27 infusates, of a total of 808 (3.3%), were colonized 29 infusates, of a total of 741 (3.9%), were colonized RR 1.15 
 (0.7 to 1.86) 1549
 (8 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowa,b  
Catheter colonization
any positive semiquantitative or quantitative culture from the distal catheter segment
240 catheters, of a total of 717 (33.4%), were colonized 266 catheters, of a total of 731 (36.4%), were colonized RR 1.08 
 (0.94 to 1.24) 1448
 (4 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderatea  
All‐cause BSI
any positive blood culture drawn from a peripheral vein taken whilst the IVD is in situ, or within 48 hours of removal (O'Grady 2002)
82 of 1135 participants (7.2%) developed a BSI from any cause 69 of 1162 participants (5.9%) developed a BSI from any cause RR 0.82 
 (0.48 to 1.4) 2297
 (6 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowa,b  
Mortality 11 of 303 neonatal ICU participants died (3.6%) during their admission to the hospital 77 of 1052 neonatal ICU participants died (7.3%) during their admission to the hospital RR 1.85 
 (1.01 to 3.38) 1355
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowa,c  
CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence:
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

aThe proportion of information from studies at high or unclear risk of bias is sufficient to affect the interpretation of results.
 bBecause of the low rate of events and the wide confidence intervals of all studies.
 cStudies included were undertaken in a specific subgroup; not able to generalize results outside of this subgroup.