Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 15;2013(9):CD003588. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003588.pub3

Jakobsen 1986.

Methods Randomized controlled trial
Participants 325 patients likely to receive IV therapy for at least 3 days. Three surgical and five medical centres, Denmark
Interventions Administration set changes at 24, 48, 72, 96 or 120 hours
Outcomes Catheter colonization
Notes Exclusions: cannula change due to extravasation; PN in main line
 Central catheters: 0%
 PN: mixed (not in main line)
 Loss to follow‐up: 27%
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear randomization method
Quote: "a prospective randomized trial" (p. 218)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not discussed
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not discussed, not feasible because of research design
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not discussed, not feasible because of research design
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Outcome blinding possible but not discussed
Quote: "All sampling was carried out by the physicians conducting the study" (p. 219)
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Inadequate information provided regarding attrition
Quote: "If cannulae [were] removed because of extravasation, the patient was excluded from the study" (p. 218)
Quote: "527 patient[s] admitted to the study; 140 were excluded for various reasons and as expected form the study design, the number excluded increased from group 1 to group 5" (p. 219)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No pre‐protocol
BSI not reported by group
Other bias High risk Quote: "The results were evaluated once a week and the study was designed to stop if a statistically significant difference in contamination rates of the cannulae and/or administration sets was found between any of the groups" (p. 219)
No baseline statistics by group provided, just "no epidemiological difference was found"
No correction for time at risk or multiple sampling