Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 15;2013(9):CD003588. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003588.pub3

Raad 2001.

Methods Randomized controlled trial
Participants 428 cancer patients requiring IV therapy. Tertiary university cancer centre, USA
Interventions Administration set changes at 72 or 96 to 168 hours
Outcomes
  • Infusate colonization

  • IR‐BSI

  • CR‐BSI

Notes Exclusions: not stated
 Central catheters: 100%
 PN: Data from PN participants couldn't be used, as they included participants receiving blood
 Loss to follow‐up: not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Adequate random sequence generation
Quote: "prospective randomized study" (abstract)
Quote: "computer‐generated randomization list" (p. 136‐7)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not discussed
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not discussed, not feasible because of study design
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not discussed, not feasible because of study design
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Outcome blinding possible but not discussed
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No mention of any missing data or attrition
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No pre‐protocol
Stopped early (n = 512) after interim analysis showed 3 IR‐BSI in 96 to 167 hour group (P = 0.09)
Other bias Unclear risk Outcome definition of contaminated tip was ≥ 10 cfu