Sitges‐Serra 1985.
Methods | Randomized controlled trial | |
Participants | 52 adult surgical patients undergoing PN through a subclavian catheter Appears to have been a hospital in Spain | |
Interventions | Administration set changes at 48 or 96 hours | |
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Exclusions: not stated Central catheters: 100% PN: 100% Loss to follow‐up: not stated | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Inadequate random sequence generation; easily predictable Quote: "patients randomly assigned to one of two groups according to their hospital number" (p. 322) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Inadequate concealment; use of hospital number easily predictable |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not discussed, but not feasible in the study design |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not discussed, but not feasible in the study design |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Outcome blinding possible but not discussed |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Minimal information provided regarding attrition; no mention of missing samples |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No pre‐protocol |
Other bias | Unclear risk | PN mean four days longer in group A (not statistically significant) No other demographic data presented |