Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 14;2018(11):CD008170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub3

Schmieder 2009.

Methods Allocation: randomized, "Randomization by center was performed by the interactive voice response system provider with the use of a validated system that automates the random assignment of patients to randomization numbers. Randomization data were kept strictly confidential until the time of unblinding."
Blinding: double‐blinded
Duration: 1 year
Funding: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ
Participants Diagnosis: hypertension, mean sitting DBP > 90 mmHg and < 110 mmHg at the single‐blind placebo run‐in visit
N = 962
Age: Aliskiren group 56.1 ± 10.9 years; HCTZ group 55.7 ± 10.9 years
Sex: 36% women; 64% men
History: mean duration of hypertension was 7.1 years. 35.2% of participants were classified as obese (body mass index 30 kg/m2), and 10.9% had DM (according to medical history)
Inclusion criteria: outpatients aged 18 years or over with essential hypertension
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Interventions RAS inhibitor: aliskiren; thiazide: HCTZ
Aliskiren 150 mg 300 mg daily
HCTZ 12.5 mg 25 mg daily
Amlodipine was added when needed
Outcomes Mean sitting DBP and SBP were measured by a mercury sphygmomanometer.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Randomization by center was performed by the interactive voice response system provider with the use of a validated system that automates the random assignment of patients to randomization numbers."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Randomization data were kept strictly confidential until the time of unblinding."
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Method of blinding was not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Missing data were unlikely to have an impact on the results of the trial
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Outcomes listed in the methods were all reported
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information was found to evaluate the risk as either high or low