Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 19;2018(10):CD003664. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003664.pub6

Marini 1996.

Methods Three‐centre randomised controlled trial in Italy.
Participants Inclusion criteria: maternal questionnaire used to identify infants with well‐defined family history of allergic disease in either parent.
Interventions Infants randomised were those whose mothers did not wish to breast feed or had insufficient milk.
 Treatment (n = 48): 'moderately' HF (Nidina HA, Nestle).
 Control (n = 47): CMF (Nan, Nestle).
 Formula feeding advised to 5 months.
 Co‐interventions (both groups): maternal cow's milk and food avoidance measures for breast feeding mothers. For infants, cow's milk and allergenic foods avoided to 1 year. Advice given to modify environmental exposure (smoking, pets, carpets, avoiding infant community care to 2 years).
Outcomes Primary outcome(s): allergic manifestations and nutritional adequacy of formula.
 Other outcomes: weight, length and head circumference at 6 months, 1 and 3 years. Physician‐diagnosed allergic disease.
 Definitions
 Atopic dermatitis: typical rash in at least 2 areas.
 Recurrent wheezing: ≥ 3 episodes and physician diagnosed.
 Recurrent urticaria: ≥ 2 episodes after exposure to particular antigen.
 GI symptoms: vomiting and/or diarrhoea after exclusion of infection and lactose intolerance, not confirmed by blinded elimination/challenge.
 Allergic rhinitis: ≥ 3 weeks rhinorrhoea.
 RAST and SPTs also performed in affected individuals.
 Follow‐up performed at 1, 2 (infant allergic disease) and 3 years (child allergic disease).
Notes Trial of prolonged supplemental or sole 'moderately' hydrolysed whey formula vs CMF feeding in high‐risk infants.
 Co‐interventions in both groups.
 Conflict of interest: none reported.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Postnatal 'random' allocation of infants; method not reported.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not reported.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk quote: "Where artificial feeding was required... babies... randomly allocated to formula (a) or formula (b) ... (but the mothers were not blinded to the allocation)".
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Physicians "unaware of the dietary regimen", but insufficient information reported on blinding of personnel to allocation.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Hydrolysed group losses 5 (10%) at 1 year, 6 (13%) at 2 years, 8 (17%) at 3 years.
 Cow's milk group losses 6 (13%) at 1 year, 7 (15%) at 2 years, 9 (19%) at 3 years.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Prespecified allergic disease outcomes. Standardised definitions.
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient data reported at baseline for allergic disease risk factors between study groups.