Fayaz 2004.
| Methods |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Interventions | Treatment group 1
Treatment group 2
Control Group
|
|
| Outcomes |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "The randomization code was computer generated by Lab View version 2" |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Drugs made up by pharmacist |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 6/60 patients withdrawn. Equally distributed across study groups and similar reasons for withdrawal given. 2 patients were withdrawn before entering the study due to oliguria and an early post‐operative SCr rise (> 20% from baseline) |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Study protocol matches outcomes presented |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |