Perttunen 1992.
| Methods |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
|
|
| Outcomes |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Study was described as randomised, method of randomisation was not reported |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Study medication looks identical; double blind study |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Nurse who made up the infusions was not involved in the study |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Missing secondary outcome data from 4/30 patients; insufficient reporting of reason behind missing data to permit judgement. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Study protocol matches outcomes presented |
| Other bias | Low risk | Non‐profit organisation funding received |