Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 29;2018(11):CD011274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011274.pub2

Perttunen 1992.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Study duration: not reported

  • Study follow‐up:72 h post‐operatively

Participants
  • Country: Finland

  • Setting: single centre

  • Inclusion criteria: patients undergoing thoracoscopy

  • Number: treatment group (15); control group (15)

  • Mean age, range (years): treatment group (59.1, 38 to 75); control group (55.3, 23 to 74)

  • Sex (M/F): treatment group 1 (11/4); control group (13/2)

  • Exclusion criteria: > 75 years; cardiac, kidney or hepatic failure; history of GI bleeding or peptic ulceration; haemorrhagic diathesis and asthma; allergy to aspirin, NSAIDs or morphine; confusion; preoperative FEV1 < 60% of reference value; sleep apnoea

Interventions Treatment group
  • Diclofenac: 400 mg in 400 mL NaCl 0.9%; 25 mL bolus given immediately after surgery then 2 mg/kg/24 h for 48 h


Control group
  • 0.9% NaCl: 400 mL; 25 mL bolus given immediately after surgery then 2 mL/kg/24 h for 48 h

Outcomes
  • Pre‐operative and post‐operative SCr and urine output

Notes
  • Funding support: supported by the Paulo Foundation, Finland

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Study was described as randomised, method of randomisation was not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Study medication looks identical; double blind study
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Nurse who made up the infusions was not involved in the study
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Missing secondary outcome data from 4/30 patients; insufficient reporting of reason behind missing data to permit judgement.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Study protocol matches outcomes presented
Other bias Low risk Non‐profit organisation funding received