Perttunen 1992.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Study was described as randomised, method of randomisation was not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Study medication looks identical; double blind study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Nurse who made up the infusions was not involved in the study |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Missing secondary outcome data from 4/30 patients; insufficient reporting of reason behind missing data to permit judgement. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Study protocol matches outcomes presented |
Other bias | Low risk | Non‐profit organisation funding received |