POISE‐2 2013.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group 1
Treatment group 2 (not included in meta‐analyses)
Control group 1
Control group 2 (not included in meta‐analyses)
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computerized randomisation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Concealed allocation |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Patients, clinicians, data collectors, and outcome adjudicators were blinded to the allocation of each intervention. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Patients, clinicians, data collectors, and outcome adjudicators were blinded to the allocation of each intervention. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Less than 5% missing creatinine values were reported. Multiple imputation models were used to handle missing data, which all yielded similar results |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Study protocol matches outcomes presented |
Other bias | Low risk | Contribution of funding sources unclear, however financial support provided by two large governmental non‐profit organisations. The authors state that the sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, review or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication |