Puolakka 2009.
| Methods |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
|
|
| Outcomes |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer generated randomisation |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Random numbers in opaque envelopes |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Nurse not involved in the study made up the study drugs |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No patients withdrawn. Missing data from 2 patients at variable time points. Missing outcome data balanced in numbers across intervention groups |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Study protocol matches outcomes presented |
| Other bias | Low risk | Non‐profit organisation funding received |