Turner 1994.
| Methods |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
|
|
| Outcomes |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Study was described as randomised, method of randomisation was not reported |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Sequential selection of previously randomised envelopes, study drugs appearing identical |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Patients, nursing staff and medical staff were blinded |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Patients, nursing staff and medical staff were blinded |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | 50 patients were included in the study, 2 patients were withdrawn due to protocol violation. Of the remaining 48 patients kidney outcome data was available from 38 patients (11% missing data). No reasons for missing data was provided |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Study protocol matches outcomes presented |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |