Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 6;2018(12):CD009362. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009362.pub3

Comparison 2. Active topical agent versus placebo/control.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pressure ulcer 4   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Active lotion versus placebo 1 167 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.73 [0.45, 1.19]
1.2 DSMO cream versus placebo 1 61 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.99 [1.10, 3.57]
1.3 Conotrane versus placebo 1 258 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.74 [0.52, 1.07]
1.4 Prevasore versus control 1 120 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.04, 3.11]
2 Pressure ulcer stage 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Stage 3 1 258 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.25 [0.34, 4.55]
2.2 Stage 4 1 258 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.01, 8.11]
3 Adverse event 1 167 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 6.14 [0.29, 129.89]