Comparison 4. Other dressing versus control.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Pressure ulcer	4		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
1.1 Polyurethane film versus hydrocolloid	1	160	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.58 [0.24, 1.41]
1.2 Kang’ huier versus routine care	1	100	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.42 [0.08, 2.05]
1.3 PPD versus no dressing	1	74	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.18 [0.04, 0.76]
1.4 Thin polyurethane foam versus no dressing	1	74	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.31 [0.83, 2.07]
1.5 Adhesive foam dressing versus no dressing	1	78	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.65 [1.10, 2.48]