Summary of findings 2. Scheduled PDE5I compared to on demand placebo or no treatment for post‐prostatectomy erectile dysfunction (long‐term).
Scheduled PDE5I compared to on demand placebo or no treatment for post‐prostatectomy erectile dysfunction (long‐term) | |||||
Patient or population: post‐prostatectomy erectile dysfunction (long‐term) Setting: outpatient clinic Intervention: scheduled PDE5I Comparison: on demand placebo or no treatment | |||||
Outcomes | № of participants (studies) Follow up | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | Relative effect (95% CI) | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | |
Risk with on demand placebo or no treatment | Risk difference with scheduled PDE5I | ||||
Self‐reported potency ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
Erectile function ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
Serious adverse events ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
Sexual quality of life assessed with: Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (sexual domain) Scale from: 0 (worst) to 100 (best) follow up: mean 54 weeks | 280 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE 1 | ‐ | The mean quality of life was 33.4 | MD 3.2 higher (5.91 lower to 12.31 higher) |
Treatment discontinuation follow up: mean 54 weeks | 420 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE 1 | RR 1.12 (0.85 to 1.48) | Study population | |
310 per 1,000 | 37 more per 1,000 (46 fewer to 149 more) | ||||
International Index of Erectile Function ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; OR: Odds ratio; | |||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect |
1 Downgraded by one level for imprecision: confidence interval crosses assumed threshold of clinically important difference.