Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 19;2018(12):CD012346. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012346.pub2

Comparison 1. Tricylic antidepressant versus placebo ‐ final follow‐up values used.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Change in depressive symptoms 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Adverse events 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 Disease‐related events: all physical symptoms 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 Disease‐related events: breathlessness symptoms 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Change in quality of life ‐ overall score 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Change in dyspnoea (Pulmonary Functional Status Instrument) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4.1 Global day‐to‐day ratings ‐ today 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4.2 Global day‐to‐day ratings ‐ with most day‐to‐day activities 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4.3 Global day‐to‐day ratings ‐ most days 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4.4 During 81 activities of daily living ‐ low demand 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4.5 During 81 activities of daily living ‐ moderate demand 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4.6 During 81 activities of daily living ‐ high demand 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4.7 At end of walk 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4.8 Change during walk 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]