1.32. Analysis.

Comparison 1 COMPARISON 1: CBT+ STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE ALONE, Outcome 32 Mental state: 10d. Specific ‐ depression (average endpoint score various scales, high = poor) (skewed data).

Mental state: 10d. Specific ‐ depression (average endpoint score various scales, high = poor) (skewed data)
Study	Interventions	Mean	SD	N
CDS ‐ short term
Barrowclough 2014	CBT + standard care	6.3667	4.3131	48
Barrowclough 2014	Standard care	4.8	4.0	23
CDS ‐ medium term
Barrowclough 2014	CBT + standard care	6.0	4.338	48
Barrowclough 2014	Standard care	6.1	5.3	23
Birchwood 2014	CBT + standard care	8.77	6.04	98
Birchwood 2014	Standard care	8.76	6.24	99
Jackson 2009	CBT + standard care	3.9	3.5	36
Jackson 2009	Standard care	5.9	4.8	30
Tarrier 2014	CBT + standard care	4.0	3.8	17
Tarrier 2014	Standard care	7.2	5.2	18
Trower 2004	CBT + standard care	8.1	7.4	14
Trower 2004	Standard care	12.6	6.7	15
BDI ‐ medium term
Rector 2003	CBT + standard care	11.7	7.9	24
Rector 2003	Standard care	11.8	11.5	18
HAMD ‐ medium term
Granholm 2005	CBT + standard care	11.4	6.3	32
Granholm 2005	Standard care	10.6	6.3	33
MADRS ‐ medium term
Gleeson 2009	CBT + standard care	8.3	9.0	41
Gleeson 2009	Standard care	10.8	11.5	40
BDI ‐ long term
Fowler 2009	CBT + standard care	14.4	12.7	33
Fowler 2009	Standard care	13.6	10.6	38
Garety 2008	CBT + standard care	16.26	13.3075	103
Garety 2008	Standard care	16.4155	13.4444	104
Rector 2003	CBT + standard care	12.0	7.8	21
Rector 2003	Standard care	12.7	11.8	13
CDS ‐ long term
Barrowclough 2014	CBT + standard care	7.0918	5.4566	49
Barrowclough 2014	Standard care	5.9	5.0	21
Birchwood 2014	CBT + standard care	12.44	6.33	98
Birchwood 2014	Standard care	11.75	5.68	99
Jackson 2009	CBT + standard care	3.7	3.9	36
Jackson 2009	Standard care	3.9	3.3	30
HADS ‐ long term
Farhall 2009	CBT + standard care	6.71	4.54	45
Farhall 2009	Standard care	6.57	4.81	47
HAMD ‐ long term
Granholm 2005	CBT + standard care	9.7	5.5	31
Granholm 2005	Standard care	11.3	6.8	33