Comparison 5. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS 4: CBT+ STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE ALONE (ASSUMATPION FOR MISSING DATA).

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Global state: 1. Relapse ‐ long term	13		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
1.1 With assumption	13	1538	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.86 [0.74, 0.99]
1.2 Without assumption	13	1523	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.84 [0.72, 0.97]
2 Mental state: 1. General ‐ clinically important change (no improvement) ‐ short term	7		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
2.1 With assumption	7	680	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.44 [0.21, 0.92]
2.2 Without assumption	7	675	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.43 [0.19, 0.99]